User identification via data collected from sensors of a wearable fitness monitor

ABSTRACT

The disclosure relates to methods, devices, and systems to recognize a user of a wearable fitness monitor using information obtained using the wearable fitness monitor. Motion data obtained from motion sensors of the wearable fitness monitor may be used to recognize or authenticate the user.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims benefits under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S.Provisional Patent Application No. 62/202,773, entitled: USERIDENTIFICATION VIA COLLECTED FITNESS DATA, filed Aug. 7, 2015, which isherein incorporated by reference in its entirety for all purposes.

BACKGROUND

Recent consumer interest in personal health has led to a variety ofpersonal health monitoring devices being offered on the market. Recentadvances in sensor, electronics, and power source miniaturization haveallowed the size of fitness monitoring devices, also sometimes referredto as “biometric tracking devices,” or “biometric monitoring devices,”“wearable fitness monitors,” “fitness monitors,” etc. to be offered insmall sizes that were previously impractical.

While such monitors have gained widespread acceptance and commercialsuccess, the use of fitness data and other data obtained by such claimsis still limited.

SUMMARY

Methods and systems are provided for determining the identification of auser of a wearable fitness monitors or authenticating the user of thewearable fitness monitors.

One aspect of the disclosure relates to methods for using two motionsignatures to determine an identity of a wearer of a wearable fitnessmonitor. In some implementations, a method comprising: (a) obtaining afirst motion signature obtained using data from one or more first motionsensors of a wearable fitness monitor configured to be worn by a person,wherein the first motion signature characterizes a movement experiencedby the wearable fitness monitor; (b) obtaining a second motion signatureobtained using data from one or more second motion sensors, wherein thesecond motion signature further characterizes the movement experiencedby the wearable fitness monitor; (c) comparing the first and secondmotion signatures or a combination thereof to a reference motion featurefor a user; and (d) based on the comparison in (c), determining whetheran identity of a wearer of the fitness monitor is the user.

In some implementations, the one or more first motion sensors comprisean accelerometer, a gyroscope, a magnetometer, an altimeter, a GPSreceiver, or any combination thereof. In some implementations, the oneor more second motion sensors comprise one or more of the first motionsensors. In some implementations, the first motion signature is a timedomain representation of a periodic motion of the movement experiencedby the wearable fitness monitor. In some implementations, the periodicmotion is produced by a movement of the wearer, wherein the movement isa step rate, a metric derived from an amplitude of the time domainrepresentation, a biking cadence, a rowing rate, a resistance-basedrepetition rate, a typing speed, a zero crossing rate, a peak-to-peaktime, an arm swing rate, and any combination thereof.

In some implementations, the first motion signature comprises afrequency domain representation of a periodic motion of the movementexperienced by the wearable fitness monitor. In some implementations,the frequency domain representation of the periodic motion of themovement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor comprises aspectral component in the periodic motion. In some implementations, thespectral component is a harmonic in the frequency domain representationof the periodic motion. In some implementations, the first motionsignature comprises a property of two or more harmonics in the frequencydomain representation of the periodic motion.

In some implementations, the first motion signature comprises a motionperiodicity and the second motion signature comprises a metric derivedfrom an amplitude of the motion periodicity. In some implementations,the first motion signature comprises a time domain representation of aperiodic motion and the second motion signature comprises a frequencydomain representation of the periodic motion. In some implementations,the user's reference motion feature comprises a model of typical motionof the user. In some implementations, the user's reference motionfeature is generated using data obtained from the one or more firstmotion sensors and the one or more second motion sensors when the userwears the wearable fitness monitor. In some implementations, the user'sreference motion feature comprises a profile of a step by the user.

In some implementations, operation (c) of the method comprises comparinga combination of the first and second motion signatures to the user'sreference motion feature, and wherein the user's reference motionfeature comprises a line, a curve, or a look up table relating the firstand second motion signatures for the user. In some implementations, (c)comprises (i) determining a difference between the user's referencemotion feature and the first and second motion signatures or thecombination thereof, and (ii) determining whether the difference isgreater than a threshold. In some implementations, (c) comprisesperforming a linear discriminant analysis on the first and second motionsignatures or the combination thereof with respect to the user'sreference motion feature. In some implementations, (c) comprisesdetermining that at least one of the first and second motion signaturesis an invalid motion for a human wearer.

In some implementations, the method further comprises determiningwhether the first and second motion signatures, taken at the same time,represent the same activity or activity level of the user, wherein theone or more second motion sensors are located on a device that isseparate from the wearable fitness monitor. In some implementations, theseparate device is a mobile phone. In some implementations, determiningwhether the first and second motion signatures, taken at the same time,represent the same activity or activity level of the user comprisesdetermining whether the first and second motion signatures represent acharacteristic of a periodic motion. In some implementations, the firstmotion signature comprises a step count or a step rate and the secondmotion signature comprises a GPS or Bluetooth signature.

In some implementations of the methods above, at least one of the firstand second motion signatures comprises a cycle profile of a periodicmotion performed by the user, and wherein the reference motion featureis a predetermined typical cycle for the user's periodic motion. In someimplementations, the cycle profile comprises a time varying amplitude ofan output from the one or more first motion sensors. In someimplementations, the user's periodic motion is selected from the groupconsisting of running, walking, cycling, swimming, weight lifting,climbing, rowing, a gymnastic exercise, dancing, an aerobic exercise, ayoga routine, golfing, swinging a club, swinging a racquet, striking aball or another object, swimming, diving, surfing, skating, skiing,skate boarding, exercising on a machine, driving a vehicle, and ridingan animal.

In some implementations, the method further includes repeating (a)-(d)at multiple times. In some implementations, wherein repeating (a)-(d) isperformed automatically, without triggering by the wearer of the fitnessmonitor. In some implementations, the method further includes,responsive to determining that the identity of the wearer of the fitnessmonitor is not the user, preventing the wearable fitness monitor fromallowing a transaction. In some implementations, the transactioncomprises accessing a secure item or providing the user with an awardfor meeting an activity threshold.

In some implementations, the method further involves, responsive todetermining that the identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isnot the user, requiring the user to authenticate himself or herself. Insome implementations, requiring the user to authenticate comprisesrequiring the wearer of the fitness monitor to input a passcode, afingerprint, an iris image, an ECG, a facial image, a vocal message, orany combination of the foregoing.

In some implementations, the method further involves, responsive todetermining that the identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isnot the user, discrediting a fitness metric obtained for the user viathe wearable fitness monitor.

In some implementations, the method further involves, responsive todetermining that the identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isthe user, crediting a fitness metric obtained for the user via thewearable fitness monitor.

In some implementations, the method further involves, responsive todetermining that the identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isthe user, allowing the wearable fitness monitor to facilitate atransaction. In some implementations, the transaction comprisesaccessing a secure item or providing the user with an award for meetingan activity threshold.

In some implementations, at least one of the one or more first motionsensors and the one or more second motion sensors are the same sensors.

In some implementations, (c) comprises obtaining a function between thefirst motion signature and the second motion signature, and comparingthe function to a reference function based on the reference motionfeature.

In some implementations, (c) comprises obtaining an average motionsignature by averaging the first motion signature and the second motionsignature, and comparing the average motion signature to the referencemotion feature.

In some implementations, (c) comprises: extracting features from thefirst motion signature and the second motion signature; forming afeature vector using the extracted features, and applying a classifierto the feature vector to determine whether the feature vector belongs toa class corresponding to the reference motion feature.

In some implementations, the obtaining the first motion signatureobtained using the data from the one or more first motion sensorscomprises: low-pass filtering the data from the one or more first motionsensors; and obtaining a cycle profile from the low-pass filtered data.In some implementations, the obtaining the cycle profile from thelow-pass filtered data comprises: obtaining local minima from thelow-passed filtered data; dividing the low-passed filtered data into twoor more segments using the local minima; and obtaining the cycle profilefrom the two or more segments. In some implementations, the obtainingthe cycle profile from the two or more segments comprises: (i) rejectingone or more outliers among the two or more segments that deviate fromthe mean of the two or more segments. In some implementations, theobtaining the cycle profile from the two or more segments furthercomprises: repeating (i) one or more times among remaining segments. Insome implementations, the obtaining the cycle profile from the two ormore segments further comprises: averaging remaining segments to obtainthe cycle profile.

In some implementations, the obtaining the first motion signatureobtained using the data from the one or more first motion sensorsfurther comprises: extracting one or more features from the cycleprofile or values derived from the cycle profile. In someimplementations, each feature is selected from the group consisting of:a slope, an inflection, a zero crossing, a derivative, a moment, acumulant, and any combination thereof. In some implementations,comparing the first motion signature to the reference motion feature forthe user comprises: obtaining a classifier using motion data obtainedfrom the user; and applying the classifier to the extracted one or morefeatures, wherein the classifier takes the one or more features asinputs and provides a classification of the wearer being the user or notthe user as an output.

In some implementations, the classifier comprises a linear discriminantanalysis classifier. In some implementations, the classifier comprises aneural network classifier. In some implementations, the classifier istrained using at least one cycle profile derived from motion dataobtained from the user. In some implementations, the method furtherinvolves updating the classifier using additional motion data obtainedfrom the user.

Another aspect of the disclosure relates to methods for using a motionsignature and a heartbeat waveform signature or a body characteristic todetermine an identity of a wearer of a wearable fitness monitor. In someimplementations, a method involves: (a) obtaining a motion signatureobtained using data from one or more motion sensors of a wearablefitness monitor configured to be worn by a person, wherein the motionsignature characterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitnessmonitor; (b) obtaining a heartbeat waveform signature obtained usingdata from one or more heartbeat waveform sensors, wherein the heartbeatwaveform signature characterizes a detected heartbeat waveform of awearer of the wearable fitness monitor; (c) comparing the motionsignature and the heartbeat waveform signature or a combination thereofto one or more reference features of a user; and (d) based on thecomparison in (c), determining whether an identity of the wearer of thefitness monitor is the user.

In some implementations, a method of identifying a user is provided. Themethod involves: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained using datafrom one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitor configuredto be worn by a person, wherein the motion signature characterizes amovement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor; (b) obtaining abody characteristic obtained using data from one or more bodycharacteristic sensors, wherein the body characteristic characterizesthe body of a person wearing the wearable fitness monitor; (c) comparingthe motion signature and the body characteristic or a combinationthereof to at least one reference feature for a user; and (d) based onthe comparison in (c), determining whether an identity of a wearer ofthe fitness monitor is the user.

In some implementations, the body characteristic is a detected responseof the one or more body characteristic sensors to the wearer's skin. Insome implementations, at least one of the one or more bodycharacteristic sensors comprises a light pulse emitter and a light pulsedetector configured to determine a variable response of the detector toa variable intensity of light pulses from the emitter.

In some implementations, the body characteristic is body compositiondetermined through bioelectrical impedance. In some implementations, atleast one of the one or more body characteristic sensors is disposed onthe wearable fitness monitor.

A further aspect of the disclosure relates to methods for using a motionsignature to determine an identity of a wearer of a wearable fitnessmonitor. In some implementations, a method includes: (a) obtaining amotion signature obtained using data from one or more motion sensors ofa wearable fitness monitor configured to be worn by a person, whereinthe motion signature characterizes a movement experienced by thewearable fitness monitor; (b) comparing the motion signature to areference motion feature for a user; and (c) based on the comparison in(b), determining whether an identity of a wearer of the fitness monitoris the user. In some implementations, the motion signature characterizesa cycle of periodic movement of the person wearing the wearable fitnessmonitor.

In some implementations, the reference motion feature is a referencecycle for periodic movement of a user. In some implementations, thereference cycle is a predetermined typical cycle for the user's periodicmotion. In some implementations, the motion signature comprises atime-varying amplitude of an output from the one or more motion sensors.

In some implementations, the user's periodic motion is selected from thegroup consisting of running, walking, cycling, swimming, weight lifting,climbing, rowing, a gymnastic exercise, dancing, an aerobic exercise, ayoga routine, golfing, swinging a club, swinging a racquet, striking aball or another object, swimming, diving, surfing, skating, skiing,skate boarding, exercising on a machine, driving a vehicle, and ridingan animal. In some implementations, the reference motion feature is acharacteristic of a periodic motion. In some implementations, thereference motion feature is a metric derived from an amplitude.

In some implementations, the obtaining the motion signature obtainedusing the data from the one or more motion sensors comprises: low-passfiltering the data from the one or more motion sensors; and obtaining acycle profile from the low-pass filtered data. In some implementations,the obtaining the cycle profile from the low-pass filtered datacomprises: obtaining local minima from the low-passed filtered data;dividing the low-passed filtered data into two or more segments usingthe local minima; and obtaining the cycle profile from the two or moresegments.

In some implementations, the obtaining the cycle profile from the two ormore segments comprises: (i) rejecting one or more outliers among thetwo or more segments that deviate from the mean of the two or moresegments. In some implementations, the obtaining the cycle profile fromthe two or more segments further comprises: repeating (i) one or moretimes among remaining segments. In some implementations, the obtainingthe cycle profile from the two or more segments further comprises:averaging remaining segments to obtain the cycle profile.

In some implementations, the obtaining the motion signature obtainedusing the data from the one or more motion sensors further comprises:extracting one or more features from the cycle profile or values derivedfrom the cycle profile. In some implementations, each feature isselected from the group consisting of: a slope, an inflection, a zerocrossing, a derivative, a moment, a cumulant, and any combinationthereof.

In some implementations, comparing the motion signature to the referencemotion feature for the user comprises: obtaining a classifier usingmotion data obtained from the user; and applying the classifier to theextracted one or more features, wherein the classifier takes the one ormore features as inputs and provides a classification of the wearerbeing the user or not the user as an output. In some implementations,the classifier comprises a linear discriminant analysis classifier.

An additional aspect of the disclosure relates to methods for using amotion signature to determine that the motion of a wearable fitnessmonitor is generated by non-human, and preventing a transaction based onthe determination. In some implementations, a method includes: (a)obtaining a motion signature obtained using data from one or more motionsensors of a wearable fitness monitor configured to be worn by a person,wherein the motion signature characterizes a body movement of the personwearing the wearable fitness monitor; (b) determining whether the motionsignature corresponds to an invalid motion feature, the invalid motionfeature characterizing motion likely to be performed by a non-human; and(c) based on the determination in (b), preventing the wearable fitnessmonitor from allowing a transaction.

In some implementations, the transaction comprises accessing a secureitem or providing an award for meeting an activity threshold to a userassociated with the wearable fitness monitor. In some implementations,the method further involves, responsive to determining that the motionsignature corresponds to the invalid motion feature, requiring a wearerof the fitness monitor to authenticate himself or herself In someimplementations, requiring the wearer to authenticate comprisesrequiring the wearer of the fitness monitor to input a passcode, afingerprint, an iris image, an ECG, a facial image, a vocal message, orany combination of the foregoing.

In some implementations, determining whether the motion signaturecorresponds to an invalid motion feature in (b) comprises: obtaining anadditional signature using data from one or more additional sensors, anddetermining that the motion signature, the additional signature, or acombination thereof is inconsistent with at least one human activity. Insome implementations, the motion signature is step rate or step countand the additional signature is a heart rate or a heartbeat waveform.

In some implementations, determining whether the motion signaturecorresponds to the invalid motion feature in (b) comprises determiningwhether a periodicity for the motion signature is within a thresholdperiodicity for a given time period. In some implementations, theinvalid motion feature is a periodic motion having a cycle-to-cycleconsistency greater than a threshold. In some implementations, theinvalid motion feature comprises one or more periodic motioncontributions from one or more spatial dimensions that is less than athreshold.

Yet another aspect of the disclosure relates to methods for using amotion signature obtained from a wearable fitness monitor and anadditional signature obtained from another device to determine if awearer of the monitor is a particular user. In some implementations, amethod involves: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained using datafrom one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitor configuredto be worn by a user, wherein the motion signature characterizes amovement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor; (b) obtaining anadditional signature obtained using the data from one or more additionalsensors located on a device that is separate from the wearable fitnessmonitor, wherein the additional motion signature further characterizesthe movement; (c) comparing the motion signature to the additionalsignature; and (d) based on the comparison in (c), determining whetheran identity of a wearer of the fitness monitor is the user.

In some implementations, the motion signature and the additionalsignature are obtained from the data collected at the same time. In someimplementations, the comparing in (c) comprises determining whether themotion signature and the additional signature represent the sameactivity or activity level of the user. In some implementations,determining whether the motion signature and the additional signaturerepresent the same activity or activity level of the user comprisesdetermining whether the motion signature and the additional signaturerepresent a characteristic of the user's gait.

In some implementations, the separate device is a mobile phone. In someimplementations, the motion signature comprises a step count or a steprate and the second motion signature comprises a GPS or Bluetoothsignature.

Another aspect of the disclosure relates to systems and devices forimplementing various methods described above. In some implementations, asystem includes: (A) a wearable fitness monitor configured to be worn bya person and comprising: one or more first motion sensors, one or moresecond motion sensors, and a communication interface configured forcommunicating data from the one or more first motion sensors to a deviceexternal to the wearable fitness monitor; and (B) classification logic.The classification logic is configured to: (a) obtain a first motionsignature obtained using data from one or more first motion sensors of awearable fitness monitor configured to be worn by a person, wherein thefirst motion signature characterizes a movement experienced by thewearable fitness monitor; (b) obtain a second motion signature obtainedusing data from one or more second motion sensors, wherein the secondmotion signature further characterizes the movement experienced by thewearable fitness monitor; (c) compare the first and second motionsignatures or a combination thereof to a reference motion feature for auser; and (d) based on the comparison in (c), determine whether anidentity of a wearer of the fitness monitor is the user.

In some implementations, a system includes (A) a wearable fitnessmonitor configured to be worn by a person and comprising: one or morefirst motion sensors, one or more heartbeat waveform sensors, and acommunication interface configured for communicating data from the oneor more first motion sensors to a device external to the wearablefitness monitor; and (B) classification logic. The classification logicis configured to: (a) obtain a motion signature obtained using data fromthe one or more motion sensors, wherein the motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor,(b) obtain a heartbeat waveform signature obtained using data from theone or more heartbeat waveform sensors, wherein the heartbeat waveformsignature characterizes a detected heartbeat waveform of a wearer of thewearable fitness monitor, (c) compare the motion signature and theheartbeat waveform signature or a combination thereof to one or morereference features of a user, and (d) based on the comparison in (c),determine whether an identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isthe user.

In some implementations, a system for identifying a user includes: (A) awearable fitness monitor configured to be worn by a person andcomprising: one or more first motion sensors, one or more bodycharacteristic sensors, and a communication interface configured forcommunicating data from the one or more first motion sensors to a deviceexternal to the wearable fitness monitor; and (B) classification logic.The classification logic is configured to: (a) obtain a motion signatureobtained using data from the one or more motion sensors, wherein themotion signature characterizes a movement experienced by the wearablefitness monitor, (b) obtain a body characteristic obtained using datafrom the one or more body characteristic sensors, wherein the bodycharacteristic characterizes the body of a wearer of the wearablefitness monitor, (c) compare the motion signature and the bodycharacteristic or a combination thereof to at least one referencefeature for a user, and (d) based on the comparison in (c), determinewhether an identity of the wearer of the wearable fitness monitor is theuser.

In some implementations, a system includes: (A) a wearable fitnessmonitor configured to be worn by a person and comprising: one or morefirst motion sensors, and a communication interface configured forcommunicating data from the one or more first motion sensors to a deviceexternal to the wearable fitness monitor; and (B) classification logicconfigured to: (a) obtain a motion signature obtained using data fromthe one or more motion sensors, wherein the motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor,(b) compare the motion signature to a reference motion feature for auser, and (c) based on the comparison in (b), determine whether anidentity of a wearer of the fitness monitor is the user.

In some implementations, a system includes: (A) a wearable fitnessmonitor configured to be worn by a person and comprising: one or morefirst motion sensors, and a communication interface configured forcommunicating data from the one or more first motion sensors to a deviceexternal to the wearable fitness monitor; and (B) classification logicconfigured to: (a) obtain a motion signature obtained using data fromthe one or more motion sensors, wherein the motion signaturecharacterizes a body movement of a wearer of the wearable fitnessmonitor, (b) comparing the motion signature to an invalid motionfeature, the invalid motion feature characterizing motion likely to beperformed by a non-human; and (c) based on the determination in (b),prevent the wearable fitness monitor from allowing a transaction.

In some implementations, a system includes: a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a user and comprising: one or more first motionsensors, and a communication interface configured for communicating datafrom the one or more first motion sensors to a device external to thewearable fitness monitor; one or more additional sensors located on adevice that is separate from the wearable fitness monitor; andclassification logic. The classification logic is configured to: (a)obtain a motion signature obtained using data from the one or more firstmotion sensors, wherein the motion signature characterizes a movementexperienced by the wearable fitness monitor; (b) obtain an additionalsignature obtained using data from the one or more additional sensors,wherein the additional motion signature further characterizes themovement; (c) compare the motion signature to the additional signature;and (d) based on the comparison in (c), determine whether an identity ofa wearer of the fitness monitor is the user.

These and other objects and features of the present disclosure willbecome more fully apparent from the following description and appendedclaims, or may be learned by the practice of the disclosure as set forthhereinafter.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The various implementations disclosed herein are illustrated by way ofexample, and not by way of limitation, in the figures of theaccompanying drawings, in which like reference numerals may refer tosimilar elements.

FIG. 1 depicts a generalized schematic of an example wearable fitnessmonitor with which various operations described herein may be executed.

FIG. 2 shows one implementation of a wearable fitness monitor having anaccelerometer, illustrating a coordinate system of the accelerometer.

FIG. 3 shows a representative 3-axis accelerometer signal from awearable fitness monitor worn on the wrist of a user who is walking.

FIG. 4 depicts the step rate and signal energy for 4 unique users.

FIG. 5 depicts the step rate and signal energy for 3 unique users for arun.

FIG. 6 depicts power spectral density of motion data of two unique userswho are otherwise indistinguishable in running by step rate and signalenergy.

FIG. 7 shows examples of heart beat waveform data obtained frompost-processing.

FIG. 8 shows a schematic illustration of a PQRST heart beat waveform.

FIG. 9 illustrates a number of time domain features of a PQRST waveform.

FIGS. 10A-10D depict representative features of the PPG waveform thatmay be used to identify the user.

FIG. 11 shows a flowchart of a method for determining whether anidentity of an instant wearer of a fitness monitor matches that of auser.

FIG. 12 shows a process 1200 for training an LDA classifier and usingthe classifier to authenticate a wearer based on the classificationresult.

FIG. 13 shows an example of acceleration data as a function of time.

FIG. 14 shows motion data depicting multiple stride profiles from a samesubject.

FIG. 15 shows eight mean stride cycle profiles for eight differentsubjects.

FIG. 16 shows an example of classification results for two-minutewalking data for eight subjects.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Numeric ranges are inclusive of the numbers defining the range. It isintended that every maximum numerical limitation given throughout thisspecification includes every lower numerical limitation, as if suchlower numerical limitations were expressly written herein. Every minimumnumerical limitation given throughout this specification will includeevery higher numerical limitation, as if such higher numericallimitations were expressly written herein. Every numerical range giventhroughout this specification will include every narrower numericalrange that falls within such broader numerical range, as if suchnarrower numerical ranges were all expressly written herein.

The headings provided herein are not intended to limit the disclosure.

Unless defined otherwise herein, all technical and scientific terms usedherein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinaryskill in the art. Various scientific dictionaries that include the termsincluded herein are well known and available to those in the art.Although any methods and materials similar or equivalent to thosedescribed herein find use in the practice or testing of the embodimentsdisclosed herein, some methods and materials are described.

Context and Overview

This disclosure relates to methods, devices, and systems to recognize auser of a wearable fitness monitor using information obtained using thewearable fitness monitor.

Example Contexts which May Identify Users Via Wearable Fitness Monitors

In cases where a wearable fitness monitor is shared amongst severalusers, the wearable fitness monitor can provide data to the correctuser's digital account.

When used to access secure resources, it may be useful for someembodiments that the wearable fitness monitor can estimate the identityof the user with some amount of certainty.

When data from the wearable fitness monitor is used to provide monetaryincentives for user behavior, it may be useful for some embodiments thatthe wearable fitness monitor knows the identity of the user with somecertainty. Additionally, trust of the user data itself (e.g., that a“step” is a true user step rather than a fake motion, hereinafterreferred to as a “fake”) can be an important aspect to some embodiments.

When data from the wearable fitness monitor is used to compete withother users of wearable fitness monitors, the veracity of the data andthe identity of the user can be an important feature to verify, whichcan ensure that the data used to compete is not faked.

Overview

In one aspect, this disclosure presents a method including the followingoperations: (a) obtaining a first motion signature obtained using datafrom one or more first motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person, wherein the first motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor;(b) obtaining a second motion signature obtained using the data from oneor more second motion sensors, wherein the second motion signaturefurther characterizes the movement experienced by the wearable fitnessmonitor; (c) comparing the first and second motion signatures or acombination thereof to a reference motion feature for a user; and (d)based on the comparison in (c), determining whether an identity of awearer of the fitness monitor is the user. In some embodiments, the oneor more first motion sensors include an accelerometer, a gyroscope, amagnetometer, an altimeter, a GPS receiver, or any combination thereof.

A “combination” of motion signatures in (c) may be used in cases wherethe signatures are not analyzed separately, but together as in the caseof a point or a curve in a multidimensional signature space. In otherembodiments, each of the first and second signatures is separatelycompared against the reference motion signature.

In certain embodiments, the “movement” experienced by the wearablefitness monitor is a voluntary body movement such as the wearer'sintentional movement of her head, neck, eyelid, mouth, shoulder, arm,wrist, finger, torso, hips, knee, ankle, and/or toe. In variousimplementations, the movement is characterized by a wearer's gait orstride when walking or running. The movement may be associated with aparticular activity type such as running, walking, cycling, swimming,weight lifting, climbing, rowing, a gymnastic exercise, dancing, anaerobic exercise, a yoga routine, golfing, swinging a club, swinging aracquet, striking a ball or another object, swimming, diving, surfing,skating, skiing, skate boarding, exercising on a machine, driving avehicle, riding an animal, etc. In some cases, the movement does notinclude involuntary motions such as heartbeats which may be determinedusing, e.g., sensor technology include photoplethysmography (PPG),electrocardiography (ECG), etc.

The comparison of the signature(s) and the reference motion signaturemay indicate that the wearer is not the user. Such cases may arise wherethe wearer is a different individual than the user and cases where the“wearer” is a robot or other automaton. The “reference motion feature”used in operation (c) may be a user reference motion feature (a templatebuilt using historical motion data of the user).

It should be understood that determining whether an identity of thewearer of the fitness monitor is the user may be a matter of probabilityor a prediction of whether the user is likely wearing the monitor. Asexplained elsewhere herein, the determination may be made bymathematical or other logical techniques that determine a distance ordifference between the wearer's current motion signature(s) and theuser's reference motion feature in movement signature space. As such,the determination may rely on a classification technique which providesa likelihood, rather than certainty, that the wearer is the user. Forinstance, classifiers using one or more of the following techniques maybe used to determine the likelihood that the wearer is the user: lineardiscriminant analysis, neural network, clustering techniques, supportvector machine, logistic regression, naive Bayes, random forest,decision tree, etc.

The sensor producing the data for the first and second motion signaturesmay be the same or different or they may overlap, with some first motionsensors being the same as some second motion sensors. In certainembodiments, the one or more second motion sensors include at least onemotion sensor from the one or more first motion sensors.

In certain embodiments, the first motion signature is a time domainrepresentation of a periodic motion of the movement experienced by thewearable fitness monitor, which periodic motion may be a person's gait,which may be, for example, a step rate, a metric derived from anamplitude of the wearer's periodic motion, a biking cadence, a rowingrate, a resistance-based repetition rate (for, e.g., weightlifting), atyping speed, a zero-crossing rate, a peak-to-peak time, an arm swingrate, or a combination thereof. In certain embodiments, the first motionsignature is a frequency domain representation of a person's periodicmotion (e.g., gait), which may include, for example, contributions of aspectral component (e.g., the fundamental frequency or a harmonicthereof) in the first motion signature. In some examples, the spectralcomponent includes a combination of the harmonics or the fundamentalfrequency and one or more harmonics. As an example, a combination of thecontributions of harmonics may be a property of two or more harmonics(or the fundamental frequency) such as a ratio of the powers of theindividual harmonics.

Various combinations of the first and second motion signatures may beused. For example, the first motion signature includes a motionperiodicity parameter (e.g., step rate) and the second motion signatureincludes a metric derived from an amplitude of the wearer's periodicmotion. In another example, the first motion signature includes a timedomain representation of a periodic motion (e.g., a wearer's gait) andthe second motion signature includes a frequency domain representationof the periodic motion.

The user's reference motion feature typically has characteristics thatfacilitate comparison with the motion signatures. For example, theuser's reference motion feature may include a predetermined typicalmotion signature for the user. Such feature may be obtained in variousways such as by using data obtained from the one or more first motionsensors and the one or more second motion sensors when the user wearsthe wearable fitness monitor. In such cases, it should be establishedthat the user is actually wearing a fitness monitor when capturing datafor generating her reference motion feature. In certain embodiments, theuser's reference motion feature comprises a profile of a step by theuser.

In some implementations, comparing the motion signature(s) to the user'sreference motion feature in (c) includes comparing a combination of thefirst and second motion signatures to the user's reference motionfeature. In such implementations, the user's reference motion featuremay be a relationship between the first and second motion signatures forthe user. As examples, the relationship may be a line, a curve, a lookup table, etc. relating the first and second motion signatures for theuser. In some examples, comparing the motion signature(s) to thereference motion feature includes (i) determining a distance (ordifference) between the user's reference motion feature and the firstand second motion signatures or the combination thereof, and (ii)determining whether the distance (or difference) is greater than athreshold. As explained elsewhere, the distance is a minimum separationbetween two points, lines, surfaces, etc. in multidimensional analysis.It may be viewed as a type of “difference.”

In some implementations, the comparison in (c) includes performing alinear discriminant analysis (LDA) on the first and second motionsignatures or the combination thereof with respect to the user'sreference motion feature. The operations and applications of LDA arefurther explained hereinafter.

In certain embodiments, the comparison in (c) includes determining thatat least one of the first and second motion signatures is an invalidmotion for a human user (e.g., it is unnatural for a human user). As anexample, a machine provides movements from which the fitness monitorgenerates data having unnaturally high consistency over time or fromcycle to cycle. Also, data produced from machine movements may beunnaturally limited to contributions from one or a few axes (e.g., oneaxis of a three-axis accelerometer or gyroscope). In variousimplementations, the comparison between motion signatures and areference motion feature may be performed by various classificationtechniques such as LDA, neural network, clustering, logistic regression,support vector machine, naïve Bayes, etc. In some embodiments, themethod includes an operation of determining whether the first and secondmotion signatures, taken at the same time, represent the same activityor activity level of the user. In some implementations, determiningwhether the first and second motion signatures, taken at the same time,represent the same activity or activity level of the user includesdetermining whether the first and second motion signatures represent acharacteristic of a periodic motion. For example, the motion signaturesmay be compared to determine whether they represent the same gait of awearer. As an example, the first motion signature includes a step countor a step rate and the second motion signature includes a GPS orBluetooth signature. This approach may be particularly relevant wherethe one or more second motion sensors are located on a device that isseparate from the wearable fitness monitor, such as a smart phone or asecond monitoring device worn or carried by the wearer of the fitnessmonitor. In some examples, the separate device is a mobile phone orother portable device with one or more sensors.

The motion signatures may be or include representations of multiplecycles of the wearer's movement or even a single cycle. For example, atleast one of the first and second motion signatures may include a cycleprofile of a periodic motion performed by the user. In such cases, thereference motion feature may be a predetermined typical cycle for theuser's periodic motion. In some implementations, the cycle profile is atime varying amplitude of an output from the one or more first motionsensors. In some implementations, the user's periodic motion is running,walking, cycling, swimming, weight lifting, climbing, rowing, agymnastic exercise, dancing, an aerobic exercise, a yoga routine,golfing, swinging a club, swinging a racquet, striking a ball or anotherobject, swimming, diving, surfing, skating, skiing, skate boarding,exercising on a machine, driving a vehicle, riding an animal, etc.

In some cases, the process of obtaining the wearer's motion signaturesand comparing them with the user's reference motion feature is performedrepeatedly, sometime continuously. For example, the above method mayinvolve repeating operations (a)-(d) at multiple times. The repeating ofoperations (a)-(d) may be performed automatically, without triggering bythe wearer of the fitness monitor.

Determining whether or not the wearer of the fitness monitor is the usercan be used in various contexts, often in the same or similar way asbiometric information is conventionally used. When the system/methoddetermines that the wearer is not the user, various actions may be takento block a transaction involving the wearer, require the wearer to takeadditional steps to authenticate or otherwise identify herself, etc. Insome cases, responsive to determining that the identity of the wearer ofthe fitness monitor is not the user, the method prevents the wearablefitness monitor from allowing a transaction. As examples, thetransaction may be accessing a secure item or providing the user with anaward for meeting an activity threshold, which may be determined fromquantifiable biometric information. In certain embodiments, responsiveto determining that the identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isnot the user, the method requires the user to authenticate himself orherself. As examples, requiring the user to authenticate may includerequiring the wearer of the fitness monitor to input a passcode, afingerprint, an iris image, an ECG, a facial image, a vocal message, orany combination of the foregoing. In certain embodiments, responsive todetermining that the identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isnot the user, the method discredits a fitness metric obtained for theuser via the wearable fitness monitor.

When the system/method determines that the wearer is the user, variousactions may be taken to credit the user or allow the user to engage in atransaction. In certain embodiments, responsive to determining that theidentity of the wearer of the fitness monitor is the user, the methodcredits a fitness metric obtained for the user via the wearable fitnessmonitor. In certain embodiments, responsive to determining that theidentity of the wearer of the fitness monitor is the user, the methodallows the wearable fitness monitor to facilitate a transaction.Examples of such transactions include accessing a secure item orproviding the user with an award for meeting an activity threshold.

In certain embodiments, at least one of the one or more first motionsensors and the one or more second motion sensors are the same sensors.In certain embodiments, the data from the first and second motionssensors includes at least a first datum from the one or more firstmotion sensors and a second datum from the one more second motionsensors.

Another aspect of the disclosure pertains to methods including thefollowing operations: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained usingdata from one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person, wherein the motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor;(b) obtaining a heartbeat waveform signature obtained using data fromone or more heartbeat waveform sensors, wherein the heartbeat waveformsignature characterizes a detected heartbeat waveform of a wearer of thewearable fitness monitor; (c) comparing the motion signature and theheartbeat waveform signature or a combination thereof to one or morereference features of a user; and (d) based on the comparison in (c),determining whether an identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor isthe user. In certain contexts, a wearer is a non-human wearer and, incertain cases, a “heartbeat waveform” is detected where the non-humanlacks a heartbeat. The method may be employed to identify the user,deauthenticate the user, etc. as described above.

Another aspect of the disclosure pertains to methods including thefollowing operations: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained usingdata from one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person, wherein the motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor;(b) obtaining a body characteristic obtained using data from one or morebody characteristic sensors, wherein the body characteristiccharacterizes the body of a person wearing the wearable fitness monitor;(c) comparing the motion signature and the body characteristic or acombination thereof to at least one reference feature for a user; and(d) based on the comparison in (c), determining whether an identity of awearer of the fitness monitor is the user. The method may be employed toidentify the user, deauthenticate the user, etc. as described above.

Various types of body characteristic may be employed, some related tobody morphology, some to body composition, some to body color, etc. Incertain embodiments, the body characteristic is one or morecharacteristics of the wearer's skin (e.g., the wearer's skin color).Skin color or another skin characteristic can be determined (orapproximated) by various techniques. In one implementation, at least oneof the one or more body characteristic sensors includes a light pulseemitter and a light pulse detector configured to determine a variableresponse of the detector to a intensity of light pulses from theemitter. The variability of the response of the detector is can beinfluenced by the user's skin color. Thus, this response may be used asa signature that is compared against a reference feature of a user. Incertain embodiments, the body characteristic is body compositiondetermined through bioelectrical impedance. In some implementations, atleast one of the one or more body characteristic sensors is disposed onthe wearable fitness monitor.

Another aspect of the disclosure pertains to methods including thefollowing operations: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained usingdata from one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person, where the motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor;(b) comparing the motion signature to a reference motion feature for auser; and (c) based on the comparison in (b), determining whether anidentity of a wearer of the fitness monitor is the user. In someimplementations, data from the one or more motion sensors arepreprocessed before the motion signature is obtained. In someimplementations the reference motion feature may be updated continuouslyor periodically after the identity of the wearer has been determined. Insome implementations, the comparison in operation (b) is implementedusing an LDA classifier.

In some embodiments, the motion signature characterizes a cycle ofperiodic movement of the person wearing the wearable fitness monitor. Acycle contains information about a wearer's step or other unit ofperiodic motion. Examples of the user's periodic motion include running,walking, cycling, swimming, weight lifting, climbing, rowing, agymnastic exercise, dancing, an aerobic exercise, a yoga routine,golfing, swinging a club, swinging a racquet, striking a ball or anotherobject, swimming, diving, surfing, skating, skiing, skate boarding,exercising on a machine, driving a vehicle, riding an animal, etc. Incertain embodiments, a motion signature for a cycle includes atime-varying amplitude of an output from the one or more motion sensors.The motion signature for a cycle may be obtained for data generatedduring a single instance of the cycle or from multiple instances, withthe instances being averaged or otherwise combined to provide the“cycle” used in this method. In embodiments where the motion signatureis a cycle, the reference motion feature may be a reference cycle forperiodic movement of a user. In some cases, such reference cycle is apredetermined typical cycle for the user's periodic motion. The methodmay be employed to identify the user, deauthenticate the user, etc. asdescribed above. In certain embodiments, the reference motion feature isa characteristic of a periodic motion. In certain embodiments, thereference motion feature is a metric derived from an amplitude (e.g., anamplitude a reference cycle).

Another aspect of the disclosure pertains to methods including thefollowing operations: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained usingdata from one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person, where the motion signaturecharacterizes a body movement of the person wearing the wearable fitnessmonitor; (b) determining whether the motion signature corresponds to aninvalid motion feature, the invalid motion feature characterizing motionlikely to be performed by a non-human; and (c) based on thedetermination in (b), preventing the wearable fitness monitor fromallowing a transaction (or deauthenticating a user associated with thefitness monitor). In certain embodiments, the transaction includesaccessing a secure item or providing an award for meeting an activitythreshold to a user associated with the wearable fitness monitor. Insome implementations, the invalid motion feature is simply an unnatural(for humans or non-machines) level of consistency or repetition in themotion signature. In a further example, an invalid motion feature haslimited dimensional range; for example, the motion feature unnaturally(for a human or non-machine) emphasizes one or two spacial dimensions.The user identification logic can identify this level of consistency orlimited dimensional range by comparing the relevant motion signaturecomponent to a defined threshold.

As mentioned unnatural motion signatures might be generated byautomatons or other machines. Additionally, an unnatural motionsignature may be generated by a non-human animal wearing the fitnessmonitor. In certain embodiments, an approach as described here allows asystem or entity to deauthenticate a user, discredit a user, preventaccess to a secure item, and/or prevent a transaction involving theuser. For example, in certain embodiments, responsive to determiningthat the motion signature corresponds to an invalid motion feature, themethod requires a wearer of the fitness monitor to authenticate himselfor herself. In some implementations, requiring the wearer toauthenticate includes requiring the wearer of the fitness monitor toinput a passcode, a fingerprint, an iris image, an ECG, a facial image,a vocal message, or any combination of the foregoing. In certainembodiments, operation (c) includes determining that the motionsignature matches an invalid motion feature, the invalid motion featurecharacterizing motion likely to be performed by a non-human.

In certain embodiments, determining whether the motion signaturecorresponds to an invalid motion feature in (b) includes obtaining anadditional signature using data from one or more additional sensors, anddetermining that the motion signature and/or the additional signatureare/is inconsistent with a human activity. In one example, the motionsignature is step rate or step count and the additional signature is aheart rate or a heartbeat waveform. In certain embodiments, determiningwhether the motion signature corresponds to the invalid motion featurein (b) includes determining whether a periodicity for the motionsignature is within a threshold periodicity for a given time period. Insome in some embodiments, determining whether the motion signaturecorresponds to the invalid motion feature in (b) includes determining arelation (e.g., a function) between step rate and heart rate for humanactivities, and determining that a combination of the motion signature(e.g., measured step rate) and the additional signature (e.g., measuredheart rate) is inconsistent with the relation determined for one or morehuman activities. In some implementations, a measured step rate iscompared to a reference step rate range associated with human activitiesto determine whether the measure step rate is outside of the step raterange of human activities. In some implementations, measured heart rateis compared to a heart rate range of human activities to determinewhether the measured heart rate is outside of the heart rate range ofhuman activities.

Another aspect of the disclosure concerns a method including thefollowing operations: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained usingdata from one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person, wherein the motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor;(b) obtaining an additional signature obtained using data from one ormore additional sensors located on a device that is separate from thewearable fitness monitor, wherein the additional motion signaturefurther characterizes the movement experienced by the wearable fitnessmonitor, or characterizes movement experienced by the device that isseparate from the wearable fitness monitor; (c) comparing the motionsignature to the additional signature; and (d) based on the comparisonin (c), determining whether an identity of a wearer of the fitnessmonitor is the user.

In certain embodiments, the motion signature and the additionalsignature are obtained from the data collected at the same time. In someimplementations, the comparing in (c) includes determining whether themotion signature and the additional signature represent the sameactivity or activity level of the user. In some implementations,determining whether the motion signature and the additional signaturerepresent the same activity or activity level of the user comprisesdetermining whether the motion signature and the additional signaturerepresent a characteristic of the user's gait. As an example, theseparate device is a mobile phone, a second fitness monitor, a headset,or other portable device. In some cases, the motion signature includes astep count or a step rate and the second motion signature includes a GPSor Bluetooth signature.

One aspect of the disclosure relates to systems that use sensor data toverify the identity of a wearer of a wearable fitness monitor. Invarious implementations, the sensor data include data from one or moremotion sensors of the wearable fitness monitor. Various implementationsof the systems are configured to perform any of the methods describedabove.

In some implementations, the system includes a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person. The wearable fitness monitor includesone or more first motion sensors, one or more second motion sensors, anda communication interface configured for communicating data from the oneor more first motion sensors to a device external to the wearablefitness monitor. The system also includes classification logicconfigured to perform operations to implement one or more methodsdescribed above. For example, in one implementation, the classificationlogic is configured to: (a) obtain a first motion signature obtainedusing data from the one or more first motion sensors of the wearablefitness monitor, wherein the first motion signature characterizes amovement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor, (b) obtain asecond motion signature obtained using the data from the one or moresecond motion sensors, wherein the second motion signature furthercharacterizes the movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor,(c) compare the first and second motion signatures or a combinationthereof to a reference motion feature for a user, and (d) based on thecomparison in (c), determine whether an identity of a wearer of thefitness monitor is the user.

In other implementations, the wearable fitness monitor is configured tobe worn by a person and includes: one or more first motion sensors, anda communication interface configured for communicating data from the oneor more first motion sensors to a device external to the wearablefitness monitor. In some implementations, the wearable fitness monitoralso includes one or more heartbeat waveform sensors. In otherimplementations, the wearable fitness monitor also includes one or morebody characteristic sensors.

In further implementations, the wearable fitness monitor includes: oneor more first motion sensors, one or more body characteristic sensors,and a communication interface configured for communicating data from theone or more first motion sensors to a device external to the wearablefitness monitor.

In some implementations, the system includes (a) a wearable fitnessmonitor configured to be worn by a person. The wearable fitness monitorincludes: one or more first motion sensors, and a communicationinterface configured for communicating data from the one or more firstmotion sensors to a device external to the wearable fitness monitor. Thesystem also includes (b) classification logic, and (c) one or moresensors located on a device that is separate from the wearable fitnessmonitor.

User Identification from Motion Signatures

As explained, the methods and systems described herein identify users offitness monitors that produce data from a motion sensor that responds tothe user's movements (e.g., motion of a limb, head, torso, wrist, etc.).Such voluntary movements are typically produced for purposes other thanuser identification or authentication, typically for the purpose ofactivity tracking and monitoring. They may be generated from the user'snormal walking or fitness activities.

Motion signatures may include any data relating motion periodicity(otherwise referred to as periodic motion) obtained from the motionsensor are analyzed by, e.g., classification logic to determine whetherthe detected motions are those of the user. Examples of data relating tomotion periodicity include step rate, a metric derived from theamplitude of the motion signal, a biking cadence, a rowing rate, aresistance-based repetition rate (e.g., weightlifting repetition rates),a typing speed, a zero crossing rate, a peak-to-peak time, an arm swingrate, or a combination thereof. A metric derived from the amplitude ofthe motion signal may be referred to herein as “motion signal energy.”Motion energy may be calculated through various methods, such asclassical energy formulas as well as simplified calculations, such asfinding the absolute difference of motion signals.

One or more motion signatures may be used to identify a user. Whenmultiple motion signatures are used, they may be used separately or incombination to identify a user. One example of a combination is a lineor curve relating two or more signature types for a user. For example, auser's motion signal energy may vary as a function of step rate in areproducible manner. Another example of a combination is where thevalues of multiple motion signatures are hashed or otherwise used toindex a lookup table. In some cases, sensors other than motion sensorsin the wearable fitness monitor are used to help identify the userwearing the fitness monitor. Such other sensors include heartbeatwaveform sensors (PPG sensors and ECG sensors), bioimpedance sensors,and EEGs, the like. In some cases, such sensors measure involuntary bodymotions such a heart beats and respiration. An example of combination ofa motion signature and another signature is a relationship betweenheartrate and step rate for a user.

A positive or negative identification of a user may be applied invarious contexts such as insurance (e.g., an insured's fitness levelfactors into her premium), automatically switching users sharing awearable fitness device, accessing secure devices such as automobileignition systems, door locks, media systems, etc., and fitnesscompetitions where the method credits or discredits the user's fitnessresults.

Timing and Use of User Identification from the Wearable Fitness Monitor(Use Cases)

Identifying a user as described herein may be performed at various timesand frequencies. In some cases, the identifying is performed at a timewhen she needs to enter into a transaction such as accessing a securedevice. For example, the system may evaluate a current motion signaturefrom a wearable fitness monitor to confirm that a user can execute atransaction (such as accessing a secure device, or receiving aninsurance benefit) at the time when the user wants to execute thetransaction. Such can occur when the activity tracker detects aninteraction with a payment system, as may occur via an NFC protocol, aBluetooth connection, or a triggering event initiated by an applicationexecuting on the activity tracker.

In some implementations, a user who wears a fitness monitor regularlyover a period of days, weeks, months, years, etc. may have her identitychecked periodically, with or without notifying the user. Theclassification logic may check the identity of the wearer of the fitnessmonitor automatically, without prompting from the user. Changes instatus may occur with or without notifying the user, e.g., useridentification logic may determine that a fitness monitor that wasidentified as being worn by the user is no longer being worn by theuser. Or the classification logic may determine that it can no longerconclude with a requisite level of confidence that the monitor is beingworn by the user. Such checks and adjustments may be made in the“background,” that is to say that they are performed without the user'sinput and/or without notifying the user.

In some implementations, evaluating motion signatures from a wearablefitness monitor results in deauthenticating a previously authenticatedwearable fitness monitor and blocks execution of a transaction. In onesequence, the process or classification logic starts by authenticating auser by using a technique other than a continuous or quasi-continuousfitness tracking measurement based on gait, heartbeat waveform, etc.Examples of the initial authentication techniques include fingerprintcapture, ECG measurement, personal identification number (PIN) entry,and/or bioimpedance measurement. Such techniques often require only ashort duration (e.g., a minute or less) to authenticate a user. Afterthe classification logic authenticates the user, the wearable fitnessmonitor motion signatures are continually or periodically evaluated bythe classification logic to determine whether to maintain authenticationor deauthenticate the user/device. Such evaluations may be conducted inthe background by the classification logic during normal operation ofthe wearable fitness monitor. When the classification logic determinesthat the user is authenticated or deauthenticated, it may or may notnotify user. In some embodiments, the user is not notified until sheattempts to execute a transaction.

In some cases, the user identification logic initially authenticates theuser using the short duration technique (e.g., fingerprint, ECG,bioimpedance, etc.), and the logic then acquires the motion signaturesproduced by the voluntary and/or involuntary actions of the user wearingthe fitness monitor, and uses these motion signatures to train a profileor other relationship between the motion signatures and a specific user.

In some cases, the device or logic may prompt the user tore-authenticate by verifying a code provided by a trusted device (e.g.,a mobile phone in which authentication is achieved via fingerprint orPIN code) or any of the motion, heartbeat, or other fitnessmonitor-based authentication methods described in this disclosure.Prompting may occur by a vibration or haptic interaction from thewearable fitness monitor. Prompting may occur at the next moment inwhich the wearable fitness monitor's user interface is engaged (e.g.,upon pressing a button or providing a motion gesture such as moving awrist wearable toward the face).

Wearable Fitness Monitors—Structure and Operation

Wearable fitness monitors suitable for use with the methods and systemsdescribed herein collect data for the user of the device such asactivity, sleep, and physiological measures. Examples include steps,distance traveled, calories burned, pace, floors climbed, elevation,number of active minutes, the start and stop of a sleep period, theduration of sleep, the number of awakenings during sleep, sleepdisturbances from external stimuli, sleep stages, apnea hypopnea index,heart rate, resting heart rate, maximum heart rate, heart ratevariability, time spent in at a specific exertion level (e.g., “cardio”zone), blood pressure, arterial stiffness, cardiovascular fitness, bloodglucose, stress and/or relaxation levels, power output on a bicycle,number of swimming laps in a pool, number of swimming strokes, type ofswimming strokes, lap splits, running mile splits, path walked or runoverland (e.g., via GNSS tracking), location, time spent at work, homeor the gym, number and/or length of sedentary periods in a day, startand stop of exercise activities such as walking, running, elliptical,swimming, bicycling, cardio workout, VO2max, SpO2, proximity to andinteractions with other wearable fitness monitor users, risk ofarrhythmia, lactate threshold, hydration level, water loss during anexercise, body fat, number of reps, sets, and types of exercisesperformed in a resistance training session, yoga poses performed andduration, respiration rate, etc., etc. Please note that “wearablefitness monitors” used herein may be a standalone wearable fitnessmonitor, multiple wearable fitness monitors, or one or more wearablefitness monitors in communication with an external server(s) usedtogether to track user activity.

Wearable fitness monitors are devices that are worn on or carried by aperson. They come in many form factors: wrist band, watch, clip, shoepod, shoe, pendant, earbuds, clothing (shirt, socks, pants,undergarments), belt, cuff links, glasses, ring, earring (nose ring,studs, etc.), helmet, hat, hair clip, and socks. For the sake ofsimplicity, a handheld mobile phone will also be classified as awearable fitness monitor because it is either held by or worn on theperson for significant periods.

In some implementations, a set of protective, attachable and/or wearablecases (herein referred to simply as “cases”) that enable a user to weara single wearable fitness monitor in multiple fashions or body locationsmay be provided. For example, in some implementations, a wearablefitness monitor may be designed such that it may be inserted into, andremoved from, a plurality of compatible cases. In other implementations,the wearable fitness monitors may be permanently or semi-permanentlymounted into (or joined to) straps, clips, clasps, bands, or otherattachments for wear. Generally speaking, the various individualelements of the various example cases and/or biometric tracking devicesshown herein may also be combined with elements from other example casesand/or biometric tracking devices shown herein, e.g., a necklace orpendant case for a removable wearable fitness monitor may also beprovided for a permanently-mounted wearable fitness monitor. Suchcombinations of elements are considered to be within the scope of thisdisclosure. Generally speaking, a wearable fitness monitor or biometrictracking device combined with a case or some other means allowing it tobe worn or easily carried by a person may be referred to herein as a“biometric monitoring system” or “biometric tracking system.”

FIG. 1 depicts a generalized schematic of an example wearable fitnessmonitor or other device with which the various operations describedherein may be executed. The wearable fitness monitor 102 may include aprocessing unit 106 having one or more processors, a memory 108, anoperator interface 104, one or more biometric sensors 110, andinput/output 112. The processing unit 106, the memory 108, the operatorinterface 104, the one or more biometric sensors 110, and theinput/output 112 may be communicatively connected via communicationspath(s) 114 (it is to be understood that some of these components mayalso be connected with one another indirectly).

The wearable fitness monitor (also referred to herein as “the device”)may collect one or more types of biometric data, e.g., data pertainingto physical characteristics of the human body (such as heartbeat,perspiration levels, etc.) and/or data relating to the physicalinteraction of that body with the environment (such as accelerometerreadings, gyroscope readings, etc.), from the one or more biometricsensors 110 and/or external devices (such as an external heart ratemonitor, e.g., a chest-strap heart rate monitor) and may then store suchinformation for later use, e.g., for communication to another device viathe I/O 112, e.g., a smartphone or to a server over a wide-area networksuch as the Internet. The processing unit 106 may also perform ananalysis on the stored data and may initiate various actions dependingon the analysis. For example, the processing unit 106 may determine thatthe data stored in the memory 108 indicates that a goal threshold hasbeen reached and may then display content on a display of the portablebiometric tracking device celebrating the achievement of the goal. Thedisplay may be part of the operator interface 104 (as may be a button orother control, not pictured, that may be used to control a functionalaspect of the wearable fitness monitor).

In general, a wearable fitness monitor may incorporate one or more typesof user interfaces including but not limited to visual, auditory,touch/vibration, or combinations thereof. The wearable fitness monitormay, for example, display the state of one or more of the data typesavailable and/or being tracked by the wearable fitness monitor through,for example, a graphical display or through the intensity and/or colorof one or more LEDs. The user interface may also be used to display datafrom other devices or internet sources. The device may also providehaptic feedback through, for instance, the vibration of a motor or achange in texture or shape of the device. In some implementations, thebiometric sensors themselves may be used as part of the user interface,e.g., accelerometer sensors may be used to detect when a person taps thehousing of the biometric monitoring unit with a finger or other objectand may then interpret such data as a user input for the purposes ofcontrolling the wearable fitness monitor. For example, double-tappingthe housing of the wearable fitness monitor may be recognized by thewearable fitness monitor as a user input that will cause the display ofthe wearable fitness monitor to turn on from an off state or that willcause the wearable fitness monitor to transition between differentmonitoring states, e.g., from a state where the wearable fitness monitormay interpret data according to rules established for an “active” personto a state where the wearable fitness monitor may interpret dataaccording to rules established for a “sleeping” person.

In another example, while the user is wearing the wearable fitnessmonitor 102, the wearable fitness monitor 102 may calculate and store auser's step count while the user is wearing the wearable fitness monitor102 and then subsequently transmit data representative of step count tothe user's account on a web service like www.fitbit.com, to a mobilephone paired with the portable biometric monitoring unit, and/or to astandalone computer where the data may be stored, processed, andvisualized by the user. Indeed, the device may measure, calculate, oruse a plurality of other physiological metrics in addition to, or inplace of, the user's step count. These include, but are not limited to,caloric energy expenditure, floors climbed or descended, heart rate,heart rate variability, heart rate recovery, location and/or heading(e.g., through GPS technology including a GPS receiver), elevation,ambulatory speed and/or distance traveled, swimming lap count, bicycledistance and/or speed, blood pressure, blood glucose, skin conduction,skin and/or body temperature, electromyography data,electroencephalographic data, weight, body fat, and respiration rate.Some of this data may be provided to the wearable fitness monitor froman external source, e.g., the user may input their height, weight, andstride in a user profile on a fitness-tracking website and suchinformation may then be communicated to the biometric tracking deviceand used to evaluate, in tandem with data measured by the biometricsensors 110, the distance traveled or calories burned of the user. Thedevice may also measure or calculate metrics related to the environmentaround the user such as barometric pressure, weather conditions, lightexposure, noise exposure, and magnetic field.

As mentioned previously, collected data from the wearable fitnessmonitor may be communicated to external devices through thecommunications interface. The communications interface may includewireless communication functionality so that when the wearable fitnessmonitor comes within range of a wireless base station or access point,the stored data automatically uploads to an Internet-viewable sourcesuch as a website, e.g., www.fitbit.com. The wireless communicationsfunctionality may be provided using one or more communicationstechnologies known in the art, e.g., Bluetooth, RFID, Near-FieldCommunications (NFC), Zigbee, Ant, optical data transmission, etc. Someof these communications technologies such as Bluetooth and NFC may becharacterized as low power and/or short range in comparison to someother wireless communications technologies such as cellular and Wifi. Insome embodiments, the wearable fitness monitor also contains wiredcommunication capability, e.g., USB.

Other implementations regarding the use of short range wirelesscommunication are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No.13/785,904, titled “Near Field Communication System, and Method ofOperating Same” filed Mar. 5, 2013 which is hereby incorporated hereinby reference in its entirety.

It is to be understood that FIG. 1 illustrates a generalizedimplementation of a wearable fitness monitor 102 that may be used toimplement a portable wearable fitness monitor or other device in whichthe various operations described herein may be executed. It is to beunderstood that in some implementations, the functionality representedin FIG. 1 may be provided in a distributed manner between, for example,an external sensor device and communication device, e.g., a chest-strapheart rate sensor that may communicate with a wearable fitness monitor.

Moreover, it is to be understood that in addition to storing programcode for execution by the processing unit to affect the various methodsand techniques of the implementations described herein, the memory 108may also store configuration data or other information used during theexecution of various programs or instruction sets or used to configurethe wearable fitness monitor. It is to be further understood that theprocessing unit may be implemented by a general or special purposeprocessor (or set of processing cores) and thus may execute sequences ofprogrammed instructions to effectuate the various operations associatedwith sensor device syncing, as well as interaction with a user, systemoperator or other system components. In some implementations, theprocessing unit may be an application-specific integrated circuit (ASIC)or programmable hardware, such as a FPGA.

Though not shown, numerous other functional blocks may be provided aspart of the wearable fitness monitor 102 according to other functions itmay be required to perform, e.g., environmental sensing functionality,etc. Other functional blocks may provide wireless telephony operationswith respect to a smartphone and/or wireless network access to a mobilecomputing device, e.g., a smartphone, tablet computer, laptop computer,etc. The functional blocks of the wearable fitness monitor 102 aredepicted as being coupled by the communication path 114 which mayinclude any number of shared or dedicated buses or signaling links. Moregenerally, however, the functional blocks shown may be interconnectedusing a variety of different architectures and may be implemented usinga variety of different underlying technologies and architectures. Withregard to the memory architecture, for example, multiple differentclasses of storage may be provided within the memory 108 to storedifferent classes of data. For example, the memory 108 may includenon-volatile storage media such as fixed or removable magnetic, optical,or semiconductor-based media to store executable code and related dataand/or volatile storage media such as static or dynamic RAM to storemore transient information and other variable data.

The various methods and techniques disclosed herein may be implementedthrough execution of one or more sequences of instructions, e.g.,software programs, by the processing unit 106 (e.g., a generalized orspecialized processor) or by a custom-built hardware ASIC(application-specific integrated circuit) or a programmable hardwaredevice such as an FPGA (field-programmable gate array), or anycombination thereof within or external to the processing unit 106.

Further implementations and implementations of wearable fitness monitorscan be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/156,304, titled“Portable Biometric Monitoring Devices and Methods of Operating Same”filed Jun. 8, 2011, which is hereby incorporated herein by reference inits entirety.

In some implementations, the wearable fitness monitor may includecomputer-executable instructions for controlling one or more processorsof the wearable fitness monitor to obtain biometric data from one ormore biometric sensors. The instructions may also control the one ormore processors to receive a request, e.g., an input from a button ortouch interface on the wearable fitness monitor, a particular pattern ofbiometric sensor data (e.g., a double-tap reading), etc., to display anaspect of the obtained biometric data on a display of the wearablefitness monitor. The aspect may be a numerical quantity, a graphic, orsimply an indicator (a goal progress indicator, for example). In someimplementations, the display may be an illuminable display so as to bevisible when displaying data but otherwise invisible to a casualobserver. The instructions may also cause the one or more processors tocause the display to turn on from an off state in order to display theaspect of the biometric data.

Motion Sensors

Motion sensors provide an output a signal responsive to motionexperienced. Examples of motion sensors include accelerometers,gyroscopes, compasses, switches (for example, mechanical), GPS modules,piezoelectric film and/or pedometers to determine, calculate and/ordetect one or more steps of the user; notably, the exemplary motionsensor may be incorporated into portable monitoring devices such aswearable fitness monitors.

The portable monitoring device may estimate, calculate and/or determine,calorie consumption, burn and/or expenditure using data which isrepresentative of the intensity of user motion—for example, as providedor determined by one or more single axis or multi-axis accelerometers.In one embodiment, the signals from the one or more accelerometers maybe filtered using time domain or frequency domain filtering techniquesto produce a parameter indicative of the intensity of user motion, oftenreferred to as a “count”. A count may be computed as the sum of therectified filtered accelerometer output taken over a suitable timeepoch, for example, 10 seconds, with or without additional processingsuch as thresholding and/or saturation. The portable monitoring devicemay calculate, determine and/or estimate calorie consumption, burnand/or expenditure as a function of the current count value or asequence of count values. Further descriptions of various motion sensorsare provided in U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2015/0134268(Attorney Reference: FTBTP014D15C2US), titled PORTABLE MONITORINGDEVICES AND METHODS OF OPERATING SAME, filed on Jan. 22, 2015, which isincorporated by reference in its entirety.

An accelerometer is often used as a motion sensor. For clarity and easeof discussion, this disclosure adopts a coordinate system as outlined inFIG. 2. It is to be understood that coordinate systems, as a rule, are amatter of convenience and may be arbitrarily defined—for example, atri-axial accelerometer may be flipped upside down to reverse theorientations of two of the three axes of the tri-axial accelerometer ormay be subjected to two 90° rotations about mutually-perpendicular axesto cause all three axes to be aligned differently from the conventionsused herein.

To that end, it is to be understood that the techniques discussed hereinmay be practiced using tri-axial accelerometers (and their correspondingmeasurement outputs) that are aligned with coordinate systems differentfrom the convention used in this disclosure (as outlined in FIG. 2). Itis to be further understood that the data from tri-axial accelerometersthat are aligned with other coordinate systems may still be used toperform the techniques discussed herein if the data from such tri-axialaccelerometers is transformed in order to align with the coordinatesystem convention adopted herein or if the techniques outlined hereinare adapted, e.g., transformed, to account for the shift in coordinatesystems (for example, if an axis is reversed from the convention usedherein, a condition stating that an acceleration along that axis be lessthan −0.125 g may have an equivalent condition in the new coordinatesystem that the acceleration along that axis be more than 0.125 g).Further descriptions of accelerometers are provided in U.S. ProvisionalPatent Application No. 62/054,345 (Attorney Reference: FTBTP003X1PUS),titled WRIST-WEARABLE DEVICE WITH WATCH-CHECK GESTURE ACTIVATION, filedon Sep. 23, 2014, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.

It is also to be understood that the accelerations obtained from theaccelerometer(s) may be first subjected to one or more pre-processingsteps prior to being used in the present techniques. For example, theaccelerations may be used in raw form (counts or accelerations convertedfrom counts, for example) or may first be smoothed or otherwiseprocessed (e.g., by using a moving average filter) to reduce noise andproduce a more stable signal.

As discussed above, the techniques of concepts presented herein areintended to provide more reliable, more responsive recognition of motionsignatures while simultaneously having a low impact on battery life. Asa result, in some cases herein, various operations that are discussedmay be performed slightly differently in actual practice. For example,as part of one technique, the magnitude of acceleration measured by atri-axial accelerometer may be evaluated to see if it exceeds athreshold acceleration.

Another type of motion sensor is an angular motion measurement system. Adetailed description of angular motion measurement systems is providedin U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/054,341 (AttorneyReference: FTBTP002X1KP), titled HIGH-DYNAMIC RANGE ANGULAR MOTIONSENSING SYSTEM, filed on Sep. 23, 2014, which is incorporated byreference in its entirety. Such systems may obtain angular motionmeasurement data using a hybrid system incorporating two different,non-gyroscopic angular motion measurement sensors. Such a systemincludes, at a minimum, a multi-accelerometer angular rate sensor(MAARS), an accelerometer/magnetometer angular rate sensor (AMARS), andlogic for determining which of the two angular rate sensors (ARS's) wereto actively used to collect data at any given instant in time.

Applications of Wearable Fitness Monitors Requiring User Identification

Control Secure Devices and Other Appliances or “Things”

In certain embodiments, wearable fitness monitors are used to control orfacilitate control of electronic and/or digital devices and systems suchas household appliances, automobiles, door locks, and the like. Suchdevices may be secure in the sense that they cannot be controlled orotherwise accessed without a form of authentication (e.g., a password)or other user identification. In various implementations, the fitnessmonitor serves to identify a user and allow access a secure electronicdevice or system. This form of identification may have otherapplications such as enabling access to secure physical areas orproperty, and customizing user experiences/interfaces for a service.Further examples include controlling a television, unlocking and/oropening the door of a residence, office, car, or other locked space,providing a digital ID and password (pin or otherwise) to access acomputer, banking account, online shopping site, or other computeraccount, changing the music played in a room for a specific user,selecting the goods to display to a user on a shopping site, etc.

Rewards and Incentives for Meeting Activity Thresholds

Similarly, wearable fitness monitors may be used to authenticate orotherwise identify a user when monitoring the user's behavior toward areduction of insurance premiums or related incentive rewards programs.For example, a user who on average walks more than 10,000 steps per dayfor a duration of 6 months may receive a cash reward. A user whoperforms medium intensity exercise for 10 minutes (or more) for 150minutes (or more) a week for 1 month may pay a discounted medicalinsurance premium. A user who performs vigorous intensity exercise for10 minutes (or more) for 75 minutes (or more) a week for 1 month mayreceive discount coupons or cash cards at a selected retailer. A userwho performs on average more than N exercises per week of a minimumduration T every 4 months may receive a cash reward (e.g., N=5, T=5min). A user who increases daily activity by 10% over a baseline dailyactivity value for 6 months may obtain a reduced insurance premium forthe following 6 months. In each of these and other cases, the wearer ofthe fitness monitor must be identified as the user before such rewardsare distributed to the user. This identification can occur at differentpoints in time as the user is wearing the device and making progresstowards the goal. The points in time may be selected according to a setfrequency, period, schedule (with different intervals betweenidentification points to appear random) or triggered based on acondition that considers progress toward a goal (e.g., if the wearablefitness monitor detects activity of a given step rate, time period ofactivity, or an activity being performed).

Fitness Competition

The data from wearable fitness monitor may also be used to competeagainst friends (e.g., in a social network), coworkers, or in a game.For example, a user who runs a specific path the fastest may be granteda title (e.g., “king of the hill”). A user who has the most steps in aweek (or any other time period) may be placed at the top of aleaderboard. A user in a digital race game may be ranked against peerson the basis of running distance in a month. In each of these and othercases, the wearer of the fitness monitor must be identified as the userbefore the fitness monitor's measured metric is ascribed to thecompeting user.

In some cases the competition may be individually based where themetrics of an individual are ranked or compared against otherindividuals. In other cases, the competitions may be group based, wheregroups are formed from multiple individuals and the metrics of themembers of the group are aggregated (e.g., summed, averaged, etc.) andthe aggregated metric of a group is compared against the aggregatedmetric of the other groups. Embodiments may allow groups to be formedbased on an attribute such as a department, company, geography (state,city), a school, a dorm, a social group, a family connection, friendconnection, favorite team, or any other suitable attribute. In othercases, embodiments may allow groups to be formed based on an invitationscheme.

Shared Devices

In some cases a wearable fitness monitor may be shared amongst multipleusers. For example, a gym, household, school, work place, or any othercommunity may provide a wearable fitness monitor to members of thatcommunity. The use of the wearable fitness monitor may be time-slicedamong the member. Rather than requiring each user initiating a sessionwith the wearable fitness monitor, the classification logic mayauthenticate the wearer of the classification logic and, onceauthenticate, correlate tracked activity data from the wearer's use ofthe wearable fitness monitor with the digital account of the wearer.

Motion Signatures and Features

In certain embodiments, the wearer of a fitness monitor is identified asthe user by obtaining one or more motion signatures from the fitnessmonitor and determining whether such signature(s) are produced by theuser's movement. Individual humans have movement characteristics whichindividually or collectively be used as a biometric identifier for theuser. Such motion signatures are described further herein. Thesesignatures and their comparison to reference features linked to the usermay allow the wearable fitness monitor to authenticate or otherwiseidentify the wearer of the wearable fitness monitor. A motion signaturemay be obtained from a motion sensor such as one of the sensor typesmentioned above. It may be viewed as a form of biometric informationthat can be collected or presented at any time to authenticate orotherwise identify the wearer of the wearable fitness monitor. Thewearer of a fitness monitor is identified as the user when the motionsignature (or the motion signature in combination with other wearerinformation) matches, to a degree required by an appropriate userclassification procedure, the information in one or more referencefeatures.

Examples of Motion Signatures

Many types of motion signatures may be obtained via data from motionsensors and may be used by the user identification logic. Some motionsignatures may represent motion in the time domain (e.g., amplitude,power, intensity, phase, field strength, etc., each as a function oftime). Others represent motion in the frequency domain (e.g., amplitude,power, intensity, phase, field strength, etc., each as a function offrequency). Other types of motion signatures are provided only inassociation with certain activity types such as running, walking,swimming, bicycling, rowing, weightlifting, etc. For example, curlrepetition count is a motion signature that is associated withweightlifting but not running or bicycling.

Some other types of motion signature employ a single cycle which may becharacterized by its “profile,” which may have either time or frequencyas an independent variable. In use, the cycle motion signature iscompared against a reference cycle feature, with the comparison matchingfeatures of the cycle such as total magnitude and/or duration (e.g.,peak-to-peak), maximum or minimum magnitude, maximum positive ornegative slope, the number and relative locations of inflection points,envelope, etc. The comparison can be performed by many differenttechniques including pattern recognition algorithms or classificationalgorithms known to those of skill in the art.

Other examples of motion signatures include step count, step rate,cadence, a metric derived from an amplitude of a periodic motion, abiking cadence, a rowing rate, a resistance-based repetition rate, atyping speed, a zero crossing rate, a peak-to-peak time, an arm swingrate, or a combination thereof.

As explained, motion signatures are obtained from data taken from motionsensors. The data may be processed little or substantially to obtainmotion signatures. Further, the motion sensor data used to obtain themotion signatures may be the raw “absolute” signal, or may be obtainedafter filtering (by, e.g., bandpass filtering, low pass filtering),scaling, and the like. In some examples, the 2-norm of the 3-axisaccelerometer motion signal may be used in lieu of or in combinationwith the (x, y, z) signal features to provide information used in amotion signature.

Motion signatures representing repetitive movement (not just a cycle)may be obtained using, e.g., data processed to obtain peak counts, zerocrossings, spectral information from, e.g., a FFT, and the like. AFourier series decomposition may be performed to extract thecontributions of multiple periodic motions to sensor signal. Thesecontributions may be harmonics associated with, e.g., steps and armmotion. Each harmonic may be a motion signature and/or the ratio of theharmonics' powers may be a motion signature. For example, it has beenfound that a user's step impact has a big effect on the power observedin higher harmonics. It is to be appreciated that although someembodiments have been described in the context of harmonics, otherembodiments can operate on any contribution of a spectral component.

It should be understood that the wearing configuration of a fitnessmonitor affects the resulting motion signature. For example, a singleuser motion may produce one motion signature when obtained using afitness monitor clipped to the user's hip and a second motion signature,different from the first motion signature, when obtained using a fitnessmonitor worn on the user's wrist. The motion signature analysis maytherefore account for the type and worn location of the fitness monitor.

Examples of Reference Motion Features

As explained, a user may be recognized by comparing a user's referencemotion feature(s) to a motion signature measured by a wearable fitnessmonitor. A few examples of reference motion features will now beprovided. FIG. 3 shows a representative 3-axis accelerometer signal froma wearable fitness monitor worn on the wrist of a user who is walking.Using an accelerometer, motion signatures such as the step rate (e.g.,steps/min) and signal energy may typify a user. For example, for a userwho is walking, the accelerometer signal energy increases with steprate. A user may be identified, distinguished from another user, ordetermined to be a fake by comparing the pair of motion signatures(step/min, signal energy) from the motion signal provided by thewearable fitness monitor to data characterizing the user's walk (e.g.,features from signals previously supplied by the user or an entityresponsible for enrolling the user and characterizing the user's walk).In various embodiments, trusted information characterizing movementtypical of the user is referred to as a reference motion feature for theuser. FIG. 4 depicts the step rate and signal energy for 4 unique users.The curve may be approximated as a line and a fitness monitor or thewearer of the fitness monitor may be classified by the nearest line tothe data from the wearable fitness monitor (i.e., to one or more motionsignatures). If the data does not lie within a reasonable limit to theline, the data may be considered fake (e.g., in the sense of a lineardiscriminant). A line is used in this example, but any model may beemployed such as an arbitrary polynomial, lookup table, etc. Also, theclassifier employed may be a neural network, support vector machine,random forest, decision tree, or other machine learning or heuristicalgorithm.

Similarly, the step rate and signal energy during a run may identify theuser, distinguish the user from another, or determined to be a fake. Inembodiments where there is no enrollment for a user, default curves orlookup tables for these quantities may be employed. FIG. 5 depicts thestep rate and signal energy for 3 unique users for a run.

In other embodiments, one user is distinguished from another by thespectral characteristics of the motion data. For example, where thespectral characteristic is a harmonic, the ratios of the second to firstharmonic, third to first harmonic, and third to second harmonic observedin the 2-norm of a 3-axis accelerometer may be used. Higher harmoniccontent corresponds to more impact in walking. Similarly, the approachcan be used for running. FIG. 6 depicts two unique users who areotherwise indistinguishable in running by step rate and signal energy,but are clearly distinguished by motion harmonics. Harmonic features mayalso be used in combination with the aforementioned walking/runningfeatures.

In other embodiments, the accelerometer motion signal is split into“cycles” (e.g., periods between two steps), aligned, time warped, andused to construct a composite or typical step profile for a user bywhich features such as the (x, y, z) axis peak-to-peak heights,envelopes, and peak-to-peak duration may be used to build a model of theuser's typical motion. A “cycle-type” motion signature and associatedreference motion feature may be used to identify a user in the mannerdescribed elsewhere herein. For example, a machine learning algorithmsuch as an LDA classifier, an artificial neural network, decision tree,support vector machine, or the like may be used to classify the user.

The aforementioned examples with an accelerometer are presented forillustrative purposes. In several other embodiments the wearable fitnessmonitor may have a gyroscope and similar or identical approaches may beemployed in lieu of or in combination with an accelerometer. In allmention of signal data and signal processing operations performed, theymay be performed on the raw “absolute” signal, or after filtering (e.g.,bandpass filter, low pass filter), scaling, and the like.

The wearable fitness monitor may store one or more invalid motionfeatures that each individually or collectively characterize motionlikely to be faked (e.g., performed by a non-human). To detect fakes,the user's identity may be rejected based on an invalid motion featurethat characterizes a detected step rate being too consistent (e.g., notvarying by more than 5 steps/min from minute to minute over a 10 minutetime window) or the motion being too periodic (e.g., each “cycle” ofmotion corresponding to a step being nearly identical to the previous),the signal energy being contained to nearly one axis of motion (e.g.,through principal component analysis with over a threshold value (e.g.,50%) of the 2-norm of a 3-axis accelerometer signal being comprised ofone motion axis), the duration of motion being too long (e.g., over 1hour with no breaks), the motion observed on an accelerometer lackinghigh harmonic structure (e.g., being too smooth or sinusoidal, no clearpresence of integer harmonics from the fundamental step frequency), ortoo erratic (e.g., 50% or more in peak-to-peak amplitude on anaccelerometer over several “step” cycles). The wearable fitness monitormay store one or more invalid motion features that each individually orcollectively characterize motion likely to be performed by a non-human.

Accordingly, a feature may thus be viewed broadly as data or logic thatdefines an expected signature of a user, either in the positive (e.g.,reference motion signatures) or in the negative (e.g., invalid motionfeatures). Such features may be expressed in a data driven manner (suchas through a line, curve, graph, data point), functionally (e.g., logicthat defines an expected threshold around a given motion signature), orsome combination thereof. And illustrative example of a functionalexpression of a feature is an invalid feature that specifies that motionsignatures that do not exceed a minimal variance are to result indeauthenticating the wearer, as may be the case where a mechanicaldevice may be causing the motion data detected by the wearable fitnessmonitor. Thus, to execute this invalid feature, the classification logicmay analyze the motion signature to determine whether the cyclesrepresented by the motion signature vary beyond a threshold.

Location and Proximity Signatures and Features

In embodiments where the wearable fitness monitor comprises a locationsensor (e.g., GPS, WiFi interface) or is in communication with a devicethat has a location sensor (e.g., a smartphone), location may be used todetermine that the wearable is not with the intended user. For example,if the activity data provided by the wearable fitness monitor does notspend significant periods of time at the user's registered home and/orworkplace (e.g., at least 8 hours at home), then the activity data maybe classified as fake in relation to a cash incentive program orcompetitive challenge. In another embodiment, if the wearable fitnessmonitor is linked to the user's smartphone (e.g., via an account on anapp running on the phone) but is not in proximity of the phone or doesnot “sync” data with the user's phone for a period of time (e.g., 1week), then the activity data provided by the wearable fitness monitormay be rejected as fake for the purposes of a cash incentive program orcompetitive challenge.

In another embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor comprises a wirelesscommunication system such as Bluetooth, Bluetooth Low Energy, Near FieldCommunication, Wifi, Body Area Network (e.g., communication routedthrough the body), and the like. In a manner similar to using a locationsensor (e.g., GPS), the device or a system incorporating the device(e.g., a mobile phone and the wearable fitness monitor or a cloud-basedserver and the wearable fitness monitor) may reject data from the deviceas a fake or de-authenticate the user based on an inference of theuser's location from communication over the wireless communicationsystem. For example, the names of enrolled or commonly observed Wifinetworks in the user's typical areas of movement (e.g., home, office,coffee shops, city/town) may be used to determine if the wearablefitness monitor is in a foreign environment, which may trigger ade-authentication. In such case, the device may prompt the user tore-authenticate by verifying a code provided by a trusted device (e.g.,a mobile phone in which authentication is achieved via fingerprint orPIN code) or any of the authentication methods described in thisdisclosure. Prompting may occur by a vibration or haptic interactionfrom the wearable fitness monitor. Prompting may occur at the nextmoment in which the wearable fitness monitor's user interface is engaged(e.g., upon pressing a button or providing a motion gesture such asmoving a wrist wearable toward the face). Notably, in the presentembodiments, it is not necessary that the system infer the geographicallocation (e.g., address, latitude and longitude) of the user based onthe communication data—it is sufficient to maintain a list of networksand/or devices that are in communication with the user.

In an embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor includes a Body AreaNetwork communication system. When the user wears the wearable fitnessmonitor (e.g., on a wrist, clipped to a bra, on clothing), the devicemay transmit data through the user's body to another device that is inclose proximity or in contact with the user. The user may touch a doorknob that likewise includes a Body Area Network communication system andthe door knob may unlock in response to the user's touch. Similarly, theuser may touch or come in close proximity (e.g., less than 1 cm) to anautomobile door handle, secured door in an office, etc., and the lockmay disengage and/or open in response. The same touch and/or proximitymay engage “syncing” of the wearable fitness monitor in the sense oftransmitting activity, sleep, and other biometric data to the devicethat is in proximity and, thereafter, a cloud-based service (e.g.,www.fitbit.com). For example, a user may have a Body Area Networkenabled lamp at home and touching the lamp may set the color and/orintensity of the light based on the user's preferences (including timeof day) and also initiate the transmission of the wearable fitnessmonitor's activity data to the lamp (if so enabled to receive this data)or other communication hub (e.g., a computer in the user's residence).

Heartbeat Waveform Signatures and Features

In one embodiment, a user may authenticate to a wearable fitness monitorthrough features of a heart rate sensor, such as an electrocardiogram(ECG).

In an embodiment where the wearable is a bracelet, the device maycontain a two electrode system where one electrode (lead 1) is incontact with the wrist and an electrode on the outer surface of thebracelet (lead 2) that is accessible by the opposite hand. When theopposite arm/hand makes contact with the bracelet (lead 2), a conductivepath across the user's torso is created and an ECG signal can becollected for multiple heart beat cycles or for some duration of time(for example 10 heart beats or 10 seconds).

The ECG waveform collected is then post-processed into a signaturewaveform. This may involve techniques such as overlapping the periodiccomponents of the waveform (e.g., individual PQRST sections), alignment,normalization, outlier removal, and linear/nonlinear filtering,outputting a composite or typical PQRST waveform signature.

FIG. 7 shows examples of data obtained from post-processing. Panel (a)of FIG. 7 shows the raw ECG waveform acquired from the wearable fitnessmonitor. Panel (b) of FIG. 7 shows the ECG waveform after filtering.Panel (c) of FIG. 7 shows overlapping multiple repeating PQRSTwaveforms. Panel (d) of FIG. 7 shows the final ECG signature waveformused for feature extraction.

Signatures are then extracted from the final ECG signature waveform.These signatures may include pathological characteristics of the PQRSTwave (shown in FIG. 8 below) use in cardiac monitoring such as the timeand magnitude features of the PR interval, PR segment, QRS complex, STsegment, and QT interval. Signatures may also include other time domain(shown in FIG. 9 below) such as the slopes, areas, curvatures, andpolynomial fits that may not directly have any direct physical ormedical significance, but present uniqueness useful for authentication.Frequency domain characteristics can also be used as features such asFourier and cosine transforms of the PQRST.

Authentication is determined through comparing the features of areference ECG vs. that of a the ECG signal detected from the currentwearer. Techniques for authentications could involve a combination oftechniques such as neural network, support vector machine, logisticregression, naive Bayes, random forest, decision tree, or other machinelearning or heuristic algorithms. After authentication is successful,the wearer can remain authenticated until the bracelet is determined tobe off wrist, such as due to device removal or loss of contact.

In an embodiment where the wearable is a shirt, the device may providecontinuous ECG measurements of the user. Similar to the embodimentsdescribed above, the ECG may be split into “beats”, aligned, and used toconstruct a composite PQRST waveform over a moving window, which is thenused to extract features to compare against a template for the user. Inthis embodiment, authentication may be continuous and the user may havea trust score that degrades if the features do not match for a period oftime longer than the moving window. If the trust score goes below adesignated threshold for a designated period of time, the user may bede-authenticated from the device. Additional features in this embodimentare that the presence of a live user may be determined both by acontinuous (or nearly continuous) heart rate signal and that the user iswearing the shirt continuously. Using clothing to house a wearablefitness monitor is described in US Patent Application Publication No.2010/0292599, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.

In another embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor may include anothertype of heart rate sensor, such as a photoplethysmograph (PPG) sensor,for instance, to monitor the heart rate of the user when it is wornagainst the wrist. FIGS. 10A-10D below depict representative features ofthe PPG waveform (and its first derivative) that may be used to identifythe user. The shape of the PPG waveform (e.g., in the sense of atemplate), which is correlated to the age of the user, may also be usedas a feature after appropriate temporal and spatial normalization.

In addition, because a PPG is a light-based sensor and because manywavelengths of light are absorbed by skin pigmentation, a PPG sensor maybe used to characterize the level of skin pigmentation for the wearer ofthe device based on a response of the PPG sensor. This may be used as anadditional feature in a user authentication system. For example, if theintensity level of the PPG's light emitter is high but the return signalto the PPG's light detector is low, then the user has higher skinpigmentation. The ratio of the return signal to the emitter output maybe used as a feature to characterize a user. Similarly, testing withdifferent light intensities and/or wavelengths may provide a transferfunction (or table lookup) for the user that may be used to identify theuser. The wearable PPG sensor may have multiple wavelength LEDs that canbe set to different intensities and/or multiple wavelength (e.g.,spectral response) photodiodes to do this characterization.

In a related embodiment, the PPG sensor may be used to determine if thewearable fitness monitor is being worn. That is, if the PPG response isnot representative of human skin (e.g., the return signal is lowrelative to the emitted output because there is nothing against thesensor), then the device can determine that it is not being worn, atleast not on the wrist. This may be determined in combination with amotion sensor (e.g., that the device is stationary on a surface).Similarly, the absence of a heart rate signal in the PPG data, or lackof heart rate variability (e.g., the duration between heart beats is tooconsistent), may be used to determine that activity data from the deviceis faked. Moderate to vigorous activity (e.g., walking or running) inthe presence of low heart rate (e.g., below 60 bpm for walking and 90bpm for running) in the PPG data may likewise indicate a fake.

In an embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor contains a motion sensorand an ECG. The user authenticates to the device with the ECG and theauthentication may be lost if the motion signature is not representativeof the registered user. In another embodiment, the wearable fitnessmonitor comprises a contact sensor (e.g., in the clasp, a PPG, orcapacitive sensor against the wrist of the user) that detects when thesensor is removed from the user's wrist and then authentication is lost.

In an embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor contains a motion sensorand a PPG. Activity data from the device may be rejected as fake if themotion signature or the PPG-derived data do not correspond to theregistered user or to human activity.

In an embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor contains an ECG and PPG.The user authenticates not only by matching the ECG morphologicalsignatures and PPG morphological signatures with those previouslyenrolled by the user (e.g., the reference features), but also incomparing the heart rate and heart rate variability of the two signalsto each other.

In another embodiment, the wearer of the device may be determined to notbe the authorized user of the device based on the heart rate exertion ofthe user observed during an exercise. For example, the user may walk ata moderate pace and if the heart rate divided by the pace (as observed,say, by GPS) or step cadence is significantly higher or lower than ischaracteristic for the authorized user, the current user of the deviceis determined to not be the authorized user. In other embodiments wherethe wearable fitness monitor automatically tracks exercises such aselliptical, bicycling, and the like, equivalent metrics of heart rateper unit activity (e.g., elliptical strokes, bicycling pace) may be usedto compare the current wearer of the device to the authorized user ofthe device.

Worn Detection

In some embodiments, optical monitors are used in the wearable monitor,implementing different modes of operation by emitting pulses of lightand detecting light after it interacts with the user's skin or othertissue, to thereby capture data that may be used to obtain the user'sheartbeat waveform, worn state, user characteristics, etc. In variousembodiments, the optical monitor is used as a heartbeat waveformmonitor, and while much of the following description refers to suchmonitors as heartbeat waveform monitors, such monitors need not beconfigured or designed to measure heartbeat waveforms. It is sufficientthat the monitor emit and detect pulses and interpret the pulsinginformation to accomplish the described results.

In some embodiments, the current disclosure provides methods foroperating a wearable fitness monitoring device having a heart ratemonitor (HRM) in a low power state when the device determines that thedevice is not worn by a user, or is “off-wrist” when implemented in awrist-worn device. This feature of the HRM is also referred to as an“automatic off” function. In some embodiments, the automatic offfunction is implemented by operating the HRM in an “unworn” (or“off-wrist”) detection mode, and the automatic off functionautomatically turns off the heart rate monitoring operations of the HRMto conserve energy if the device determines that it is not being worn bythe user. Other benefits of the automatic off function include providingmore accurate heart rate estimation. For example, when an automatic offor automatic on (described below) is performed a heart rate detectionalgorithm may reset. In one implementation, the algorithm stops runningwhen off-wrist is detected, and restarts when on-wrist is detected. Whenthe heart rate monitor restarts, it resets.

In some embodiments, the current disclosure provides methods foroperating a wearable fitness monitoring device having a heart ratemonitor in a normal power state when the device is worn by the user, or“on-wrist” when implemented in a wrist-worn device. This feature of theHRM is also referred to as an “automatic on” function. In someembodiments, the automatic on function is implemented by operating theHRM in a “worn” (or “on-wrist”) detection mode. The automatic onfunction automatically takes the HRM out of a low power state and turnson the heart rate monitoring operations of the HRM if the device detectsmotion and determines that it is worn by the user.

In some embodiments, the unworn (or off-wrist) and worn (or on-wrist)detection may be implemented by light (e.g., LED) probing, which emitslight pulses and detects signals after the light pulses interact withthe user's skin and tissues. In some embodiments, the unworn and wornprobing may share some hardware, firmware, software, and/or parametersfor light emission, light detection, and analyses of detected signals.In other embodiments, the two probing modes employ different hardware,firmware, software, and/or parameters for light emission, lightdetection, and analyses may be used for unworn and worn detection.

In some embodiments, the wearable fitness monitoring device goes in andout of the low power state regulated by a probe light (e.g., LED) and amotion detector, implementing automatic off and on functions. In the lowpower state, the heart rate monitor saves power by turning off, orscaling back operation of, its LED light source and its photodetector.In some embodiments, other light sources and light detectors (e.g.,photodiodes, photomultiplier tubes, CCD, or CMOS) may be used toimplement the automatic off and on functions.

Some embodiments provide a method of operating a heart rate monitor of awearable fitness monitoring device having a plurality of sensors. Themethod includes: (a) operating the heart rate monitor in a first modewhile also operating in a second mode configured to detect nearproximity of the wearable fitness monitoring device to a user's skin,where the first mode is configured to determine one or morecharacteristics of a user's heartbeat waveform when the wearable fitnessmonitoring device is in near proximity to the user; (b) from informationcollected in the second mode, determining that the heart rate monitor isnot proximate to the user's skin; and (c) in response to determiningthat the heart rate monitor is not proximate to the user's skin, endingoperating the heart rate monitor in the first mode. In some embodiments,the one or more characteristics of the user's heartbeat waveform includethe user's heart rate.

In some embodiments, the wearable fitness monitor includes a motionsensor, and the method further involving: prior to (c), determining frominformation output by the motion detecting sensor that the wearablefitness monitoring device has had been still for at least a definedperiod; and in response to detecting that the wearable fitnessmonitoring device has had been still for at least the defined period,performing (c). In some embodiments, prior to (a) while the first modeis not operating, the device (i) detects motion of the wearable fitnessmonitoring device using a motion detecting sensor and/or detectingproximity of the heart rate monitor to the user′ skin by operating theheart rate monitor in a third mode; and (ii) initiates operation of thefirst mode of the heart rate monitor when the wearable fitnessmonitoring device is determined to be in near proximity to the user.Further implementations of operating heart rate monitors are provided inU.S. Pat. No. 8,948,832 (Attorney Reference: FTBTP002X1GUS), titledWEARABLE HEART RATE MONITOR, filed on May 30, 2014, which isincorporated by reference in its entirety.

Other User Signatures and Features

In yet other embodiments, the wearable fitness monitor has abioimpedance sensor (possibly sharing the same electrodes as the ECG)and the bioimpedance of the user is further used with the ECG and/or PPGto determine the current user of the wearable fitness monitor.

In yet another embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor has afingerprint sensor (e.g., capacitive, ultrasound) that images thepattern of skin ridges on the finger(s) of a user to authenticate theuser to a device (e.g., when the device is put on, when the device isused as a proxy for a credit card). The device may include an ECG, PPG,and/or bioimpedance sensor to further enhance the authentication systemwith user-specific biometric data. The device may maintainauthentication through motion signatures of the user and PPG-basedsignatures of the user. Removal of the device (e.g., as detected by acapacitive sensor mounted on the back of a wrist wearable fitnessmonitor, as detected optically using an optical sensor (perhaps the sameas a PPG sensor or an independent optical sensor), as detected by asensor in the clasp of a wrist wearable fitness monitor) mayde-authenticate the wearer of the device.

In another embodiment, the authorized user of the wearable fitnessmonitor may also have a smartphone that tracks user activity such aswalking. If the smartphone walking activity does not match the time andapproximate count of the wearable fitness monitor walking activity datafor more than a threshold percentage (e.g., 50% of time over someperiod), then the data of the wearable fitness monitor is consideredfake. If the wearable fitness monitor is used as a proxy for a creditcard or other secure service, the authorization of the user isdeactivated. Reauthentication may be established by displaying a code orimage on the wearable fitness monitor and entering the same on theuser's mobile phone. Likewise, if the mobile phone is used as a proxyfor a credit card or other secure service, the authorization of it maybe deactivated until reauthentication by matching a code or image to thewearable is performed. If the wearable fitness monitor comprises alocation sensor (e.g., GPS), it may activate the sensor and broadcastits location when it next synchronizes to a cloud-based service.

In another embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor tracks the sleep ofthe user based on sensor data generated by the wearable fitness monitor.For example, the wearable may use motion data and/or heart rate data toinfer when a user is asleep. Other examples include the use of skintemperature, galvanic skin response, SpO2, blood pressure, and time ofday in combination with or in lieu of the preceding data to infer whenthe user is asleep. If the user is determined to be asleep by thewearable fitness monitor (or a system in communication with the wearablefitness monitor such as a mobile phone or cloud-based service), theauthentication may be “blacked out” so that the wearable fitness monitorcannot be used to access secure digital accounts, open secure areas,etc. Upon waking, the user may retain authentication.

Skin Calibration

Skin color may be used to define one or more features of a user. Inaddition, skin color may affect heart rate measurements. This sectiondiscloses techniques for measuring skin color as a user feature andusing skin measurements to improve measurements of other features suchas heart rate.

Ambient light and skin color may make it difficult to extract a user'sheart rate from a PPG signal. The effect of ambient light may be reducedby subtracting a value of the received detected light signal when thePPG light source is off from the value of the received detected lightsignal when the PPG light source is on (assuming that both signals areobtained in close temporal proximity to each other). The effect of skincolor may be reduced by changing the intensity of the PPG light source,the wavelength of the light emitted from the light source, and/or byusing the ratio or difference of received signal corresponding to twodifferent wavelengths. Skin color may be determined by using user input(e.g. the user entering their skin color), an image of the person'sface, etc., and may then subsequently be used to calibrate thealgorithm, light source brightness, light source wavelength, and thereceiver gain. The effect of skin color (and tightness with which theuser is wearing the device) on the raw PPG signal may also be measuredby sending in a signal of known amplitude to the light source(s) andthen measuring the received signal from the photodetector(s). Such asignal may be sent for a prolonged period of time (so as to capture datathrough multiple expected heart beats) and then averaged to produce asteady-state data set that is not heart-rate dependent. This amplitudemay then be compared to a set of values stored in a table to determinealgorithm calibration, transmitter amplitude and the receiver gain.

In some embodiments, the disclosure provides methods and devices toaccurately measure heartbeat waveform for different usercharacteristics, such as skin colors, motion, sweat, position, andphysiologic state (e.g., skin thickness, body fat, etc.) of the users.Because darker skin has lower reflectance of light, the relationsbetween photodetector reading and light pulse intensity, e.g., DAC,tends to have a lower slope than for paler skin. In some embodiments,the signals for skin characterization may operate intermittently athigher frequency than the light pulses of the first mode for heart ratemonitoring.

Some embodiments provide a method for adjusting at least one setting foroperating a heart rate monitor in a wearable fitness monitoring device.The method involves: (a) pulsing a light source in the heart monitor ina skin characterization mode by emitting a succession of light pulses,at least some having variable intensity with respect to one another; (b)detecting a variation in intensity of light from the light pulsesemitted in the skin characterization mode after the light has interactedwith the user's skin; (c) determining a response characteristic of theuser's skin from the variation in intensity of light detected in (b);and (d) using the response characteristic of the user's skin to adjust again and/or light emission intensity of the heart rate monitor operatingin a first mode for detecting one or more characteristics of the user'sheartbeat waveform.

In some embodiments, the response characteristic is dependent on anopacity value of the user's skin. In some embodiments, operating in thefirst mode and operating in the skin characterization mode are performedconcurrently. In some embodiments, operating in the first mode andoperating in the skin characterization mode concurrently involvesperiodically determining a response characteristic of the user's skinwhile continuously operating in the first mode.

In some embodiments, operating in the first mode involves pulsing thelight source in the heart rate monitor at a first frequency anddetecting light from the light source, after the light has interactedwith the user's skin, at the first frequency. Furthermore, operating inthe skin characterization mode involves pulsing the light source in theheart rate monitor at a second frequency and detecting light from thelight source at the second frequency.

In some embodiments, as described above, the wearable fitness monitormay store a reference feature relating to the response of a sensor tothe skin of a user to later verify the user based on a current responseof the sensor to the skin of the wearer of the wearable fitness monitorusing, for example, the aforementioned techniques.

Comparing User Signatures to User Reference Features

Various classification and identification techniques may be applied tocompare motion and/or other signatures to user reference features.Generally, such techniques determine whether or not it is likely thatthe motion signature obtained from a fitness monitor was created by auser in question wearing the device. In this way, a wearer of thefitness monitor can be authenticated or otherwise identified.

The logic used to compare a signature to a reference feature may be aclassifier or other routine implemented on the fitness monitor and/or asecondary device as described elsewhere herein. As examples, theclassifier employed may be an LDA classifier, neural network, supportvector machine, random forest, decision tree, or other machine learningor heuristic algorithm.

As mentioned, the motion signal may be split into “cycles” (e.g.,periods between two steps), aligned, time warped, and used to constructa composite or typical step profile for a user by which features such asthe (x, y, z) axis peak-to-peak heights, envelopes, and peak-to-peakduration may be used to build a model of the user's typical motion. Aswith other types of signatures, this may be used by a machine learningalgorithm such as a neural network, decision tree, support vectormachine, and the like to classify the user.

In certain embodiments, the classification logic compares signatures toreference features and applies a level of confidence (provided directlyor indirectly by the comparison algorithm) for authenticating orotherwise identifying the user. The confidence level for identifying theuser may be set as appropriate for the application (insurance versusfitness credits in casual competition). The level may also be set forthe type of classification algorithm used to compare the wearer'ssignature(s) to the user's reference feature.

FIG. 11 shows a flowchart of a method for determining whether anidentity of an instant wearer of a fitness monitor matches that of auser. If an instant wearer's identity matches that of the user, theinstant wearer is authenticated as the user. For example, the user maybe an owner or an authorized user of the wearable fitness monitor.Because the motion features of the user are provided as a referenceagainst which a wearer's data are compared, the user is also referred toas the reference user herein.

In the implementations shown in FIG. 11, the operations of process 1100are performed by a single wearable fitness monitor. In otherimplementations, some of the operations can be performed by the wearablefitness monitor, while others operations can be performed by an externaldevice associated with the wearable fitness monitor such as smart phone,a personal computer, a tablet, or a webserver that is associated orcommunicatively linked to the wearable fitness monitor.

Process 1100 involves obtaining a reference motion feature of thereference user (or user as used elsewhere herein) using one or moremotion sensors on the wearable fitness monitor worn by the user. Seeblock 1102. The motion sensors may be selected from accelerometers,gyroscopes, GPS sensors, and other motion sensors described hereinelsewhere. In some implementations, the reference motion featurecomprises a motion cycle profile as described above and hereinafter atblock 1206 of FIG. 12.

At block 1104, process 1100 involves training a classifier using thereference motion feature. In some implementations, the classifier is abinary classifier. In some examples, the classifier is a lineardiscriminant (LDA) classifier. Although an LDA classifier is provided asan example below, in various implementations, other classifiersdescribed herein or known in the field may be used instead of or incombination with an LDA. For instance, clustering methods, neuralnetworks, support vector machines, linear and nonlinear models, decisiontrees, etc., may be used as classifiers to classify the wearer. In someimplementations, as described above for the LDA classifier, test dataare classified as two classes. In some implementations, the classifiermay determine three or more classes. In such implementations, theclassifier may be implemented to authenticate three or more users. Insome implementations, a C-class LDA classifier may be used, where C isnot fewer than three.

A binary LDA provides a method to classify data in a multidimensionalspace into two classes: a target class and a non-target. Data pointsfrom each of the two classes are provided to train the classifier. TheLDA projects the data points into a new space that best separates thetwo classes of the data points. More specifically, the projected datapoints have an optimal combination of mean difference and classvariance, with the largest difference in means of the two classes andthe smallest variance within each class. The LDA determines a hyperplanethat separate the two classes of data. The projections of data pointsfrom the same class are very close to each other and at the same timethe projected means of the two classes are as far apart from each otheras possible. After the LDA classifier has been trained, the classifieris applied to a test vector. The test vector belongs to the target classif the test vector is located on the same side of the hyperplane as thetarget class, and the location of the hyper plane is defined by athreshold value.

The process 1100 further involves obtaining a motion signature frommotion data of an instant wearer, using the one or more motion sensorsof the wearable fitness monitor. See block 1106. The process 1100 shownin FIG. 11 uses the same motion sensors and the same wearable fitnessmonitor to obtain both the reference motion feature and the motionsignature. However, in some implementations, the reference motionfeature may be provided by sensors or wearable fitness monitorsdifferent from those producing the motion signature. For instance, thereference motion feature may be imported from another wearable fitnessmonitor or computer, and then stored on the instant wearable fitnessmonitor or an instant computer performing one or more operations ofprocess 1100. Then the imported reference motion feature may be comparedwith the motion signature on the instant wearable fitness monitor or theinstant computing device.

Operations 1102 and 1104 represent a different phase of the process fromoperations 1106-1110, with 1102 and 1104 performed initially and theresult used repeatedly in 1106-10. Training the classifier isqualitatively different from using the classifier. Of course, 1102 and1104 can be performed more than once to update the classifier asdescribed in the example below. But typically a single trainedclassifier can be used repeatedly to determine identity.

In some implementations, the process involves obtaining two or moremotion signatures from motion data of an instant wearer. In someimplementations, the two or more motion signatures comprise two or moremotion cycle profiles. In some implementations, the two more motionsignatures comprise two different motion features, such as step rate andmotion signal power.

Process 1100 involves comparing the motion signature to the referencemotion signature by applying the classifier (e.g., a LDA classifier) tothe motion signature. See block 1108. Although an LDA classifier isprovided as an example, other classifiers described herein or known inthe field may be used in some implementations instead of or incombination with an LDA. In some implementations, a feature vector isextracted from the reference motion feature, which feature vector isthen provided as a data point belonging to the target class to train theLDA classifier. The LDA classifier may also be trained by additionaldata points belonging to the target class and additional data pointsbelonging to the nontarget class. When more data points are provided totrain the LDA classifier, the confidence of classification may beimproved.

In some implementations, the motion signature is analyzed to extract afeature vector, which can then be tested using the LDA classifier todetermine whether the motion signature from the instant wearer matchesthe reference motion feature from the reference user. The LDA classifiertakes a feature vector as an input and provides a target or a non-targetclassification as an output.

If the feature vector extracted from the motion signature of the instantwearer is classified as the target class, it means that the motionsignature matches the reference motion feature. Therefore, the processcan determine that the identity of the wearer of the fitness monitor ifthe reference user. See block 1110.

In some implementations, when two or more motion signatures areobtained, they can be combined into one value or function, which canthen be compared to the reference motion feature. In someimplementations, two motion cycle profiles may be averaged, and then theaverage profile may be compared to a reference cycle profile. In someimplementations, values of two motion signatures can form a function(e.g., power as a function of step rate), which can then be compared toa reference function. In some implementations, it is possible toclassify each of the motion signatures and combine the classificationresults, e.g., in a probabilistic framework such as Naïve Bayes. Such aprobabilistic combination is also known as Bayesian Fusion. Otherprobabilistic approaches instead of or in addition to Naïve Bayes (e.g.,a mixture model of multiple probability functions) may also be used tocombine multiple motion signatures.

FIG. 12 shows an implementation of a process 1200 for training aclassifier and using the classifier to authenticate a wearer based onthe classification result. Although an LDA classifier is provided as anexample, other classifiers described herein or known in the field may beused in some implementations instead of or in combination with an LDA.Operation 1102 of obtaining a reference motion feature of the user maybe implemented according to operations 1202, 1204, and 1206 of FIG. 12.Operation 1104 of training a linear discriminant analysis classifier maybe implemented as the operations 1208 and 1112 of FIG. 12. In someimplementations, operation 1106 of obtaining a motion signature may beimplemented as operations 1202, 1204, and 1206. The operation 1108 ofcomparing the motion signature to the reference motion feature may beimplemented as operation 1208 and the 1214 in FIG. 12. Operation 1110 ofdetermining whether the motion signature matches the reference motionfeature may be implemented as operation 1216 of FIG. 12.

Process 1200 starts operating one or more motion sensors of a wearablefitness monitor to generate motion data. See block 1202. In someimplementations, the one or more motion sensors are selected fromaccelerometers, gyroscopes, magnetometers, GPS sensors, etc. In someimplementations, the motion data include, for instance, about 2 minutesof data sampled at 25 Hz. In some implementations, motion data includeabout 5 minutes of data. In some implementations, reference data may beobtained when the wearable fitness monitor is worn by a reference userin a training phase. Then in a testing phase, data provided by aninstant wearer are compared to the reference data. When the instantwearer's data match the reference data, the wearer's identity isdetermined to match the identity of the user, thereby providingauthentication to the wearer.

For example, the owner of the wearable fitness monitor is a referenceuser in this context. Training data are collected from the owner of thewearable fitness monitor. In a testing phase, the wearable fitnessmonitor may determine whether an instant wearer of the wearable fitnessmonitor has the same identity as the owner, thereby authenticating thewearer as the reference user.

In some implementations, the wearable fitness monitor may experiencemotion caused by walking or running at various speeds. In someimplementations, data from different speeds or speed ranges are used totrain and generate different classifiers. Although an LDA classifier isprovided as an example, other classifiers described herein or known inthe field may be used in some implementations instead of or incombination with an LDA. The different classifiers will be applied fordata associated with different speeds. In some implementations, datagenerated by motion at different speeds or speed ranges may be used totrain and generate a single LDA classifier. In some implementations,data are normalized on the time dimension to obtain a single cycleprofile of the motion data. In some implementations, movement speed maybe provided as a feature of a feature vector, and the feature vectorbeing provided to train the LDA classifier or test the LDA classifier.

In some imitations, motion data includes data of one, two or threemotion sensors. In some imitations, each motion sensor includes threeaxes. In some implementations, motion data from one axis of a motionsensor are used. Such implementations can provide effectiveclassification and efficient analysis when signal is sufficientlystrong.

Process 1200 involves preprocessing motion data generated by the motionsensors using various techniques. See block 1204. In someimplementations, one or more of the preprocessing techniques describedherein are optional. In some implementations, raw motion sensor data arelow-pass filtered to smooth the data. In some implementations, data maybe smoothed by a rolling time window. In some implementations, localminima are obtained from the smoothed data. FIG. 13 shows an example ofacceleration data as a function of time. As shown in the example, thefiltering and smoothing provide are more regular and cyclic data. Thesmoothed data can then be segmented into stride profiles or cycleprofiles. See block 1206 of FIG. 12. FIG. 14 shows motion data depictingmultiple stride profiles from a same subject. In some implementations,data of multiple stride profiles are normalized on the time dimension.In some implementations, a profile of a mean stride is calculated frommultiple strides. In some implementations, outlier profiles that deviatefrom the mean stride over a criterion are removed. In someimplementations, a new mean stride is obtained from stride profileshaving the outliers removed. In some implementations, outlier removaland averaging are performed for additional iterations to furtherimproved representativeness of the obtained mean stride profile.

In some implementations, one cycle profile of a mean stride is obtainedat operation 1206. In some implementations, two or more cycle profilesmay be obtained from the motion data to provide training data to trainthe classifier. In some plantations, cycle profiles from multiple usersare obtained, which are then used to train the classifier. At least onecycle profile belongs to the target class of the reference user, and atleast one cycle profile belongs to the nontarget class other than thereference user. FIG. 15 shows eight mean stride cycle profiles for eightdifferent subjects.

Process 1200 further involves extracting at least one feature vectorfrom the at least one cycle profile. See block 1208. In someimplementations, signal values based on amplitude may be used to extractfeatures such as slopes, minima, maxima, accelerations, relativedistance between features, etc. In some implementations, features may bebased on moments, cumulants, time frequency domain functions, etc. Insome implementations, additional features may be added to the featurevector to train or test the classifier. In some implementations, theadditional features include motion data not reflected by the cycleprofile. For instance, speed of motion may be used as an additionalfeature. In other implementations, other biometric data may be used toprovide additional features of the feature vector, which can then beused to train the classifier or be tested using the classifier. Forinstance, heart rate, blood pressure, respiration rate, skin color, andother metrics described herein may be included as additional features.

Process 1200 further involves determining whether to train theclassifier or to apply the classifier to authenticate a wearer. Seeblock 1210. An LDA classifier is an example of a suitable classifier.Other classifiers described herein or known in the field may be used insome implementations instead of or in combination with an LDA. When theprocess determines to train the LDA classifier, the motion data isconfigured to be obtained from the reference user. The reference user'sidentity is the reference identity, against which an instance wearer'sidentity is compared to. If the instant wearer's identity matches thatof the reference user, the instant wearer is authenticated as thereference user.

If the process proceeds to train the LDA classifier, feature vectors areused to train the classifier. See block 1212. The at least one cycleprofile obtained in 1206, along non-target data, is used to train theLDA classifier. The at least one cycle profile is equivalent to thereference motion feature in blocks 1104, 1108, and 1110 of FIG. 11. Invarious implementations, at least one feature vector of a target cycleprofile and at least one feature vector from a non-target cycle profileare obtained to train the LDA classifier. The target cycle profile isobtained from the reference user. The non-target profile can be obtainedfrom a person other than the reference user. In some implementations,the non-target profile may be obtained from the reference userperforming a motion that is different from a target motion. In variousapplications, numerous feature vectors are obtained from the referenceuser to train the LDA classifier. In some implementations, the multiplefeature vectors obtained from the reference user provide data points ofthe target class. In some implementations, one or more feature vectorsobtained from motion data from individuals other than the reference userare also provided as data points of the nontarget class to train the LDAclassifier.

In some implementations process 1200 then determines whether to continueto train the LDA classifier with additional data. See block 1222. If thedecision is positive, process 1200 returns to operation 1202 to generatemore motion data using the one or more motion sensors of the wearablefitness monitor. The training LDA classifier operations described aboveare repeated.

In some implementations, operation 1210 decides to apply the LDAclassifier to determine whether the instant wearer is the referenceuser. In such a case, the at least one cycle profile obtained in block1206 is equivalent to the motion signature in blocks 1106, 1108, and1110 in FIG. 11. The process uses the LDA classifier by applying it tothe at least one feature vector. See block 1214. In effect, thisoperation compares the feature vector obtained from the motion data ofthe instant wearer to that obtained from the reference user. The LDAclassifier takes the feature vector as an input and provides an outputof a classification of whether or not the data belongs to the targetclass, i.e., the reference user. If the data is classified as belongingto the reference user, the wearable fitness monitor providesauthentication to the wearer, determining that the wearer has the sameidentity as the reference user. See block 1218. Otherwise, the processdoes not provide authentication to the wearer, or requires the wearer toprovide an alternative method to authenticate the wearer's identity. Forinstance, the wearer may be required to provide a fingerprint, password,retina scan, a heart rate measurement, or other biometric data forauthenticating the wearer. In some implementations, the wearer may berequired to provide more motion data to repeat the authenticationoperations described above.

In some implementations, process 1200 proceeds to determine whether tocontinue to train or use the LDA classifier. If the decision ispositive, the process loops back to operation 1202 to generate moremotion data to train or use the LDA classifier.

In some implementations, decision 1222 determines to continue to trainthe LDA classifier. Such an implementation may provide continuouslearning of the classifier using data reflecting long-term change of thereference user's motion. In some implementations, the motion change maybe due to physiological or environmental changes associated with theuser. For instance, a user may be injured and as a result develop adifferent motion cycle profile. In some instances, the user may havedifferent characteristics of motion at different times of a day. In someinstances, a same user may have different cycle profile during differentkinds of activities. The continue training of the LDA classifier mayimprove the classifier's ability to account for these different factors.In some implementations, the continual training of the LDA classifiercan improve the confidence of the classification. For instance, two ormore classifiers may be generated for the same user depending on certainfactors, such as time of the day or activity types. In someimplementations, values of additional factors may be included into thefeature vector used to train the LDA classifier or other types ofclassifier.

In some implementations, decision 1222 operates to continue to apply theLDA classifier to multiple sets of cycle profiles. In suchimplementations, each set of cycle profiles may be classified by theclassifier. Then multiple classification results can be combined byprobabilistic methods to obtain a final classification result. Themultiple classification results may be combined by Bayesian Fusion usingNaive Bayes. See block 1223 outlined by dashed lines indicating anoptional operation. The final classification result can then be used todetermine if a user should be authenticated. In such an implementation,the authentication of 1218 is modified to be contingent on the finalclassification result meeting an authentication criterion.

Finally, process 1200 can determine not to continue to train or use theLDA classifier, and the process comes to an end at block 1224.

FIG. 16 shows example classification results for two-minute walking data(fs=25 Hz) for 8 subjects. The data set is randomly divided intotraining and testing sets. The graph shows the performance of theclassifier on these 8 subjects.

Systems

In one embodiment, the wearable fitness monitor is one component of asystem that comprises a secondary device capable of communicating withthe wearable fitness monitor. In some implementations, the secondarydevice may be a smart phone, a PDA, a tablet, or a computer. In someimplementations, the secondary device may have a shape and mechanicaland/or magnetic interface to accept the wearable fitness monitor forsafe keeping, communication, and/or charging. Notably, the communicationbetween the wearable fitness monitor and the secondary device may beprovided through wireless communication techniques/methods and protocolsmentioned elsewhere herein. In some implementations, a secondary deviceperforms the biometric matching between a wearer's motion signature anda user's reference feature.

In some implementations, the secondary device may comprise sensors toassist in biometric or environmental monitoring such as, for example,sensors that measure ambient light, noise and/or sound (e.g., to detectsnoring), temperature, humidity, and air quality (pollen, dust, CO2,etc.). In one embodiment, the secondary device may communicate with anexternal service such as www.fitbit.com or server (e.g., personalcomputer). Communication may be achieved through wired or wirelesscircuitry and protocols to transfer data to and/or from the secondarydevice. As examples, any of the wireless technologies described abovefor the fitness monitor may be used. The secondary device may also actas a relay to transfer data to and/or from the wearable fitness monitorto an external service such as www.fitbit.com or other service (e.g.,news, social network updates, email, calendar notifications).Calculation of the user's fitness data may be executed on one or bothdevices or an external service (e.g., a cloud server) using data fromone or both devices.

In some implementations, one or more of the operations performed toidentify a user are performed on a secondary device. It should beunderstood that some or all of the operations may be performed on thewearable fitness monitor. Often, the operations are divided between thewearable fitness monitor and the secondary device.

As mentioned above, the wearable fitness monitor may be used as a proxyto authorize a credit card or other secure service. Moreover, data ofthe wearable fitness monitor for an authorized user may be compared tothe user's data of a smart phone. The comparison results may be used toauthorize a user. Based on the data from the wearable fitness monitorand/or the smart phone, a user may be authorized, deauthorized, and orreauthorized. In some implementations, the authorization,deauthorization, and reauthorization may be performed “online” on thewearable fitness monitor. In such cases, the classifier logic mayexecute on the wearable fitness monitor. In other implementations, theauthorization, deauthorization, and reauthorization may be performed onthe smart phone. In such cases, the classifier logic may execute on thesmart phone. In further implementations, the authorization,deauthorization, and reauthorization may be performed “offline” on aback end server over a network. In such cases, the classification logicmay be implemented on the back-end servers. In yet otherimplementations, the authorization, deauthorization, and reauthorizationmay be performed using the wearable fitness monitor, the smart phone,and the back end server. In such cases, portions of the classificationlogic is split among those devices/systems.

The techniques and functions outlined above may be implemented in awearable fitness monitor as machine-readable instruction sets, either assoftware stored in memory, as application-specific integrated circuits,field-programmable gate-arrays, or other mechanisms for providing systemcontrol. Such instruction sets may be provided to a processor orprocessors of a wearable fitness monitor to cause the processor orprocessors to control other aspects of the wearable fitness monitor toprovide the functionality described above.

Unless the context (where the term “context” is used per its typical,general definition) of this disclosure clearly requires otherwise,throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,”“comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense asopposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in a senseof “including, but not limited to.” Words using the singular or pluralnumber also generally include the plural or singular numberrespectively. Additionally, the words “herein,” “hereunder,” “above,”“below,” and words of similar import refer to this application as awhole and not to any particular portions of this application. When theword “or” is used in reference to a list of two or more items, that wordcovers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of theitems in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination ofthe items in the list. The term “implementation” refers toimplementations of techniques and methods described herein, as well asto physical objects that embody the structures and/or incorporate thetechniques and/or methods described herein.

There are many concepts and implementations described and illustratedherein. While certain features, attributes and advantages of theimplementations discussed herein have been described and illustrated, itshould be understood that many others, as well as different and/orsimilar implementations, features, attributes and advantages of thepresent inventions, are apparent from the description and illustrations.As such, the above implementations are merely exemplary. They are notintended to be exhaustive or to limit the disclosure to the preciseforms, techniques, materials and/or configurations disclosed. Manymodifications and variations are possible in light of this disclosure.It is to be understood that other implementations may be utilized andoperational changes may be made without departing from the scope of thepresent disclosure. As such, the scope of the disclosure is not limitedsolely to the description above because the description of the aboveimplementations has been presented for the purposes of illustration anddescription.

Notably, the present disclosure is neither limited to any single aspectnor implementation, nor to any single combination and/or permutation ofsuch aspects and/or implementations. Moreover, each of the aspects ofthe present disclosure, and/or implementations thereof, may be employedalone or in combination with one or more of the other aspects and/orimplementations thereof. For the sake of brevity, many of thosepermutations and combinations will not be discussed and/or illustratedseparately herein.

None of the pending claims include limitations presented in “means plusfunction” or “step plus function” form. (See, 35 USC §112(f)). It isApplicant's intent that none of the claim limitations be interpretedunder or in accordance with 35 U.S.C. §112(f).

The present disclosure may be embodied in other specific forms withoutdeparting from its spirit or essential characteristics. The describedembodiments are to be considered in all respects only as illustrativeand not restrictive. The scope of the disclosure is, therefore,indicated by the appended claims rather than by the foregoingdescription. All changes which come within the meaning and range ofequivalency of the claims are to be embraced within their scope.

1. A method comprising: (a) obtaining a motion signature obtained usingdata from one or more motion sensors of a wearable fitness monitorconfigured to be worn by a person, wherein the motion signaturecharacterizes a movement experienced by the wearable fitness monitor;(b) comparing the motion signature to a reference motion feature for auser; and (c) based on the comparison in (b), determining whether anidentity of a wearer of the fitness monitor is the user.
 2. The methodof claim 1, wherein the motion signature characterizes a cycle ofperiodic movement of the person wearing the wearable fitness monitor. 3.The method of claim 2, wherein the reference motion feature is areference cycle for periodic movement of a user. 4-5. (canceled)
 6. Themethod of claim 2, wherein the user's periodic motion is selected fromthe group consisting of running, walking, cycling, swimming, weightlifting, climbing, rowing, a gymnastic exercise, dancing, an aerobicexercise, a yoga routine, golfing, swinging a club, swinging a racquet,striking a ball or another object, swimming, diving, surfing, skating,skiing, skate boarding, exercising on a machine, driving a vehicle, andriding an animal.
 7. The method of claim 1, wherein the reference motionfeature is a characteristic of a periodic motion.
 8. (canceled)
 9. Themethod of claim 1, wherein the obtaining the motion signature obtainedusing the data from the one or more motion sensors comprises low-passfiltering the data from the one or more motion sensors.
 10. The methodof claim 9, wherein the obtaining the motion signature obtained usingthe data from the one or more motion sensors further comprises obtaininga cycle profile from the low-pass filtered data.
 11. The method of claim10, where the obtaining the cycle profile from the low-pass filtereddata comprises: obtaining local minima from the low-passed filtereddata; dividing the low-passed filtered data into two or more segmentsusing the local minima; and obtaining the cycle profile from the two ormore segments. 12-14. (canceled)
 15. The method of claim 9, wherein theobtaining the motion signature obtained using the data from the one ormore motion sensors further comprises: extracting one or more featuresfrom the cycle profile or values derived from the cycle profile.
 16. Themethod of claim 15, wherein each feature is selected from the groupconsisting of: a slope, an inflection, a zero crossing, a derivative, amoment, a cumulant, and any combination thereof.
 17. The method of claim15, wherein comparing the motion signature to the reference motionfeature for the user comprises: obtaining a classifier using motion dataobtained from the user; and applying the classifier to the extracted oneor more features, wherein the classifier takes the one or more featuresas inputs and provides a classification of the wearer being the user ornot the user as an output.
 18. The method of claim 17, wherein theclassifier comprises a linear discriminant analysis classifier.
 19. Themethod of claim 17, wherein the classifier comprises a neural networkclassifier.
 20. The method of claim 17, wherein the classifier istrained using at least one cycle profile derived from motion dataobtained from the user.
 21. The method of claim 17, further comprising,updating the classifier using additional motion data obtained from theuser.
 22. A system comprising: a wearable fitness monitor configured tobe worn by a person and comprising: one or more first motion sensors,and a communication interface configured for communicating data from theone or more first motion sensors to a device external to the wearablefitness monitor; and classification logic configured to: (a) obtain amotion signature obtained using data from the one or more motionsensors, wherein the motion signature characterizes a movementexperienced by the wearable fitness monitor, (b) compare the motionsignature to a reference motion feature for a user, and (c) based on thecomparison in (b), determine whether an identity of a wearer of thefitness monitor is the user.
 23. The system of claim 22, wherein themotion signature characterizes a cycle of periodic movement of theperson wearing the wearable fitness monitor.
 24. The system of claim 23,wherein the reference motion feature is a reference cycle for periodicmovement of a user. 25-26. (canceled)
 27. The system of claim 23,wherein the user's periodic motion is selected from the group consistingof running, walking, cycling, swimming, weight lifting, climbing,rowing, a gymnastic exercise, dancing, an aerobic exercise, a yogaroutine, golfing, swinging a club, swinging a racquet, striking a ballor another object, swimming, diving, surfing, skating, skiing, skateboarding, exercising on a machine, driving a vehicle, and riding ananimal.
 28. The system of claim 22, wherein the reference motion featureis a characteristic of a periodic motion.
 29. (canceled)
 30. The systemof claim 22, wherein (a) comprises low-pass filtering the data from theone or more motion sensors.
 31. The system of claim 30, wherein (a)further comprises obtaining a cycle profile from the low-pass filtereddata.
 32. The system of claim 31, where the obtaining the cycle profilefrom the low-pass filtered data comprises: obtaining local minima fromthe low-passed filtered data; dividing the low-passed filtered data intotwo or more segments using the local minima; and obtaining the cycleprofile from the two or more segments. 33-35. (canceled)
 36. The systemof claim 30, wherein the obtaining the motion signature obtained usingthe data from the one or more motion sensors further comprises:extracting one or more features from the cycle profile or values derivedfrom the cycle profile.
 37. The system of claim 36, wherein each featureis selected from the group consisting of: a slope, an inflection, a zerocrossing, a derivative, a moment, a cumulant, and any combinationthereof.
 38. The system of claim 36, wherein comparing the motionsignature to the reference motion feature for the user comprises:obtaining a classifier using motion data obtained from the user; andapplying the classifier to the extracted one or more features, whereinthe classifier takes the one or more features as inputs and provides aclassification of the wearer being the user or not the user as anoutput.
 39. The system of claim 38, wherein the classifier comprises alinear discriminant analysis classifier.
 40. The system of claim 38,wherein the classifier comprises a neural network classifier.
 41. Thesystem of claim 38, wherein the classifier is trained using at least onecycle profile derived from motion data obtained from the user.
 42. Thesystem of claim 38, further comprising, updating the classifier usingadditional motion data obtained from the user.